0
What else can I help you with?
What is contradictory evidence?
Contradictory evidence refers to information or data that conflicts with other evidence or conclusions on a particular topic. It can create uncertainty or challenge the validity of existing beliefs, theories, or hypotheses. When contradictory evidence arises, it often requires further investigation and critical analysis to resolve the discrepancies.
What is scientific accuracy?
Scientific accuracy refers to the extent to which information, findings, or conclusions presented align with established scientific understanding and evidence. It involves ensuring that research methods are rigorous, data are correctly interpreted, and conclusions are supported by evidence. Maintaining scientific accuracy is crucial to uphold the reliability and credibility of scientific knowledge.
What is The mental process of forming one belief on the basis of others?
This is known as inference, where new beliefs are drawn from existing beliefs or information. It involves reasoning, logic, and drawing conclusions based on the available data or evidence.
How do writers of research reports gather evidence?
Writers of research reports gather evidence through various methods such as conducting experiments, surveys, interviews, observations, and reviewing existing literature. They analyze the data collected to support their research questions or hypotheses and draw conclusions based on the evidence obtained. The evidence is then presented in a structured and systematic manner in the research report to support the findings and recommendations.
The remains of or indirect evidence of a pre existing organism is called a?
fossil
Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence. True False?
True
Is it true conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
Is it true that Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
How do historians support they're conclusions?
Historians support their conclusions by conducting thorough research, analyzing various historical sources, evaluating the reliability of each source, considering differing perspectives, and presenting their findings backed up with evidence. They also engage with the existing scholarship in the field to build upon or challenge established interpretations.
Assessing whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustrates?
naturalistic observation
What is contradictory evidence?
Contradictory evidence refers to information or data that conflicts with other evidence or conclusions on a particular topic. It can create uncertainty or challenge the validity of existing beliefs, theories, or hypotheses. When contradictory evidence arises, it often requires further investigation and critical analysis to resolve the discrepancies.
Did Norse people wear horns on their helmets?
There is no historical evidence of it ever existing, but only a small amount of Viking Helmets have ever been found.
When conducting research for forming a hypothesis which practice should historians follow?
Historians should conduct thorough research by examining primary and secondary sources, analyzing existing historiography, and critically evaluating evidence before formulating a hypothesis. It is essential to consider the context in which historical events occurred and to approach the research with objectivity and openness to different interpretations.
What is scientific accuracy?
Scientific accuracy refers to the extent to which information, findings, or conclusions presented align with established scientific understanding and evidence. It involves ensuring that research methods are rigorous, data are correctly interpreted, and conclusions are supported by evidence. Maintaining scientific accuracy is crucial to uphold the reliability and credibility of scientific knowledge.
What is The mental process of forming one belief on the basis of others?
This is known as inference, where new beliefs are drawn from existing beliefs or information. It involves reasoning, logic, and drawing conclusions based on the available data or evidence.
Why is much of history is still open to interpretation?
History is open to interpretation because it relies on analyzing and interpreting sources that are often incomplete, biased, or have different perspectives. Historians bring their own perspectives and biases to their interpretations, leading to differing conclusions. Additionally, new evidence or discoveries can challenge existing interpretations, leading to ongoing debate and revision of historical narratives.
Is evaluating existing programs important in a society with a large bureaucracy?
NO, bcuz gov't has no clue wat they are doing
