.can't explain the origin of the cloud .how would cloud stick together? .some planets and moons spin backwards
democritus
Democritus
No - you can use evidence from an experiment to support a theory, but they are not the same thing. A theory is an idea as to why something is, how it works, etc. that is strongly supported by evidence. An experiment is set up in order to gather information to support a theory or to help a hypothesis become a theory.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
Intelligent design, Hovind Theory Added: The above are not scientific theories but more ideological assertions in nature. No positive evidence supports either assertion.
There is evidence that the Nebular hypothesis was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg.Immanuel Kant, who was familiar with Swedenborg's work, developed the theory further in 1755. A similar model was proposed in 1796 by Pierre-Simon Laplace.
nebular
The answer is Nebular Theory
nebular
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
the nebular theory
Emanuel Swedenborg.
doon lang...
They both exploded
nebular theory
nebular theory