Legalize POT
No, as it would conflict with the federal limits.
A court would need to amend the trust.A court would need to amend the trust.A court would need to amend the trust.A court would need to amend the trust.
Trick question. That depends on the state statute and whether it is repugnant to the US Constitution or federal law in an area where the federal government asserts supremacy. If the statute falls under the penumbra of states' rights, then the statute is controlling and the US Supreme Court will (should) uphold it. If the statute is unconstitutional under the US Constitution and involves a part of the Constitution incorporated (applied) to the states, then the US Supreme Court decision is controlling. If the statute would be unconstitutional under the US Constitution, but involves a part of the constitution not incorporated to the states (for example, the Seventh Amendment), the Supreme Court will decide whether to apply the Constitution, which would then be binding on all states, or whether to allow the state statute to stand, in which case the state statute would be controlling.
The statute of limitations for process of service depends upon whether it is a state or federal case. If it is a federal case then the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4(m)would apply, wherein you have 120 days to serve the complaint or it may be dismissed. If it is a state case, the state rules of civil procedure, along with any local rules would apply.
No such statute exists and, if one did, HIPAA would overrule it at the federal level. It is specifically illegal to withhold medical records in order to collect payment.
Amend the Constitution
A judgment in Texas typically stays on your credit report for seven years from the date it was filed. However, in some cases, it can be extended beyond that timeframe. It's important to check your credit report regularly to ensure accuracy and address any errors.
The United Kingdom is a 'devolved unitary' state, for the UK to become 'federal' it would require a written constitution as the Westminster parliament can simply abolish any of the devolved assemblies under ordinary statute law.
He opposes repealing DOMA. He voted twice to amend the US Constitution to ban same-sex marriage. (It did not pass.). He also voted for a failed bill that would have prevented federal courts from overturning DOMA.
It is not likely the court would amend such an order since it was rendered at the time of the divorce as a fair division of marital assets.It is not likely the court would amend such an order since it was rendered at the time of the divorce as a fair division of marital assets.It is not likely the court would amend such an order since it was rendered at the time of the divorce as a fair division of marital assets.It is not likely the court would amend such an order since it was rendered at the time of the divorce as a fair division of marital assets.
Legally in the US, 18 years old. Anything less would be a felony under federal statute and in most states.
No, you cannot amend a deposition. A deposition is a record of a person's answers to questions asked by an attorney under oath. Amending would render in incomplete.