Art of all types tend to have a large focus on the human condition, which includes the self-centered and antisocial tendencies.
Human beings are animals, therefore they have animal natures.
The humanistic movement in psychology is oriented toward the positive nature of human beings. This includes Client centered, Gestalt and Existential theory. Individual Theory, part of the psychodynamic movement in psychology, also centers around the positive nature of human beings.
Human behaviour is highly adaptive to social nature. Humans, after all, are social beings. Their behaviour can be shaped and even changed by the society they belong to.
That's nature at work. One of the innate traits of all living things is to reproduce. Nature makes it as attractive and interesting for humans as possible as humans are complex beings and require strong incentives to make it all happen. Over the centuries, humans have piled on a mountain of social and commercial incentives, but nature starts with an attraction to get the whole process started.
This is a big debate question, and I suggest looking up the factors of each online, and trying to decide which you think is how human development has occurred, although most people go with a bit of both.
Legalism
Legalism
The science of ecopsychology focuses on the relationship that human beings have with nature. The two primary principles of this science is ecology and psychology.
Han Gaozu
Human beings are animals, therefore they have animal natures.
It focuses on the accomplishments of individuals.
human beings derive their rights from nature
nature, self reliance and the goodness of human beings
The term nature is generally understood to mean the way things were before human beings interfered.
James Shanahan has written: 'Nature stories' -- subject(s): Environmentalism, Nature, Effect of human beings on, Philosophy of nature
nature, self reliance and the goodness of human beings
Mencius