Want this question answered?
Only if both ends are at the same height. If a resultant force is more on one side than on the other side, then that will cause the side with the higher resultant to accelerate downwards or upwards, depending on the direction of the resultant force. The forces would be unbalanced in that system.
balanced forces are when the two opposite forces are equal and cause no change to the object e.g a car at a steady speed. unbalanced forces would cause the car to increase or decrease in speed
When the forces acting on an object are balanced, they cancel each other out and the result is no change in its motion.Balanced forces have no effect on motion. Unbalanced forces cause acceleration.
The definition of fin on a rocket would be, a thin, protruding piece of metal whose function is to provide aerodynamic stabilization when the rocket is in flight.
The would be balanced forces.
Right, just an illustration. Water is the propelllant that forces to bottle rocket upwards. Imagine a hosepipe. If you hold it in your hand the water trickles out slowly. If you put your finger over the end, a fast an strong spary comes out. This is the result of water pressure. Likewise, if the bottom of the bottle were the same diameter as the rest of the bottle, there would be little pressure, and the water would just fall out. The bottleneck of a bottle acts as a funnel, which increases the pressure and cause water to come out faster and last a little longer. This crests a concentrated upward force which propels the bottle upwards.
Only if both ends are at the same height. If a resultant force is more on one side than on the other side, then that will cause the side with the higher resultant to accelerate downwards or upwards, depending on the direction of the resultant force. The forces would be unbalanced in that system.
Only if both ends are at the same height. If a resultant force is more on one side than on the other side, then that will cause the side with the higher resultant to accelerate downwards or upwards, depending on the direction of the resultant force. The forces would be unbalanced in that system.
It would obviously fall to the ground. However, if you have a rocket which can't overcome gravity, you've got a pretty bad rocket...
the blast force would cause it to accelerate at Hugh speed thus the spacecraft goes upwards.
To say that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction is slightly misleading you, as these forces are NOT on the same object. Better to say 'if A exerts a force on B, then B exerts an equal and opposite force on A'. When I stand on my bathroom scales, I exert a downward force on the scales, which deflect until they exert an equal and opposite force on me, thus preventing me from falling. Acceleration occurs to ME when forces on ME are unbalanced. e.g. if I stood on a rocket the upward force of the rocket on me is greater than the downward force of gravity, so I would accelerate upwards. These are NOT action-reaction forces. What are action-reaction forces are the force I exert on the rocket and the force the rocket exerts on me.
It would probably cause the supply curve upwards and shift to the left.
i would assume just like general aviation it would be lift (upwards) weight or gravity (downwards) thrust (forward) and drag (backwards)
These are ionic bonds.
It was designed to handle flooding in upwards of 4 compartments.
An imbalance between the electrostatic and strong nuclear forces
because i dont really know