answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Grapes, pomegranates, and figs.

Numbers 13:23 And they came unto the brook of Eshcol, and cut down from thence a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bare it between two upon a staff; and they brought of the pomegranates, and of the figs.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

Grapes

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What fruit did the spies bring back to Moses?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What does moses bring back from the summit of the mountains?

Moses brought 2 stone tablets inscribed with the ten commandments from the summit of Mount Sinai.


What report did the spies bring back from Canaan?

The "Spies account" in the Book of Numbers actually involves two different, conflated accounts, each representing a different point of view regarding the Promised Land. In the Yahwist account (Numbers 13:27-29), the spies returned and issued their report to one person (Moses), stating that the land was flowing with milk and honey, but that the inhabitants included some giants and and the cities fortified. In the Priestly account (13:25-26,32-33) the spies returned and issued their report to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation. This report stated that Canaan was not only unconquerable, but a land that devours its inhabitants; all the people they saw were giants.


How many spies did moses send to canaan?

12, One from each Family/Tribe No spies were sent into Egypt, but you are probably referring to the sending of the spies into Canaan, which was the Promised Land. There were indeed twelve.


Can you bring fruit back from Ghana on an aeroplane into England?

The most accurate asnwer you will get - is by contacting HMRC BEFORE you travel - they will tell you what you can and can't brinfg back into the UK. If you try to bring back prohibited items - you will likely be fined, and the fruit would be confiscated and destroyed.


What was the bounty supposed to bring back from England in mutiny of the bounty?

bread fruit trees


In the magicians nephew what fruit does digory bring back from Narnia?

A very special Apple


What was the dilemma that the Israelites encountered in the reports that the spies brought back in the book of numbers?

In the Book of Numbers, there are two parallel stories of the spies who entered the land of the Canaanites, each representing a different tradition. The dilemma is slightly different in each case. In one account, by the Yahwist author, Moses dispatched the spies, who travelled only as far north as Hebron (in the future kingdom of Judah). They issued their report to one person (Moses), stating that the land was 'flowing with milk and honey', but that the inhabitants were giants and and their cities fortified (Numbers 13:27-29). Only Caleb tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest, to which the spies countered that the land was unconquerable. In the second account, by the Priestly author, Moses appointed twelve heads of tribes to scout the land, and they toured the entire Promised Land, 'from the Wilderness of Zin to the entrance to Hamath'. The spies returned and displayed the land's fruit. They issued their report to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation, stating that Canaan was not only unconquerable, but a 'land that devours its inhabitants' (Numbers 13:32-33). Caleb and Joshua both tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest. The dilemma in the first account is that the land is very desirable, but unconquerable. In the second account, the land is is not only unconquerable but also devours its inhabitants, although it is desirable for its fruit.


Can you bring a child back from the dead after appendix kills them in er?

yes if you can get a fruit bats urine and rub it in their mouth it should bring them back in time for you to shove poison ivy up the butt


How does the Bible describe the land of Canaan?

In the Book of Numbers, two parallel stories of the spies who entered the land of the Canaanites are expertly intertwined, each representing a different tradition. The spies came back and described the land of Canaan, with slightly different reports in each case.'Yahwist' versionIn one account, attributed to the Yahwist source, Moses dispatched the spies, who travelled only as far north as Hebron (in the future kingdom of Judah). They issued their report to one person (Moses), stating that the land was 'flowing with milk and honey', but that the inhabitants were giants and and their cities fortified (Numbers 13:27-29). Only Caleb tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest, to which the spies countered that the land was unconquerable (13:30-31,33). 'Priestly' versionIn the second account, from the Priestly Source, Moses appointed twelve heads of tribes to scout the land, and they toured the entire Promised Land, 'from the Wilderness of Zin to the entrance to Hamath'. The spies returned and displayed the land's fruit. They issued their report to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation, stating that Canaan was not only unconquerable, but a 'land that devours its inhabitants' (Numbers 13:32-33).


Who told moses to go back to Egypt?

God told Moses to go back to Egypt.


What did you find confusing in the Book of Numbers?

A:The 'Spies' story is confusing to some. Approaching their destination after more than a year of wandering, Moses was commanded to send men to search out the land of the Canaanites. There are two separate versions of this account, blended together and sufficiently similar to appear to the casual reader to be just one rather complex account:--In the first version: Moses dispatched the spies (13:17b-20); the spies travelled only as far north as Hebron (in the future kingdom of Judah) (13:22-25); the spies returned and issued their report to one person (Moses), stating that the land was 'flowing with milk and honey', but that the inhabitants were giants and their cities fortified (13:27-29); Caleb alone tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest (13:30); the spies countered Caleb's claim, stating that the land was unconquerable (13:31,33); the people refused to enter Canaan and plotted to elect a new captain to lead them back to Egypt (14:1b, 4);God was angry, threatening to destroy the people by plague (14:11-12);God chose not to destroy the Israelites, instead they were to wander the desert until the present generation had died, and Caleb alone of this generation would live to enter the Promised Land (14:20-25).In the second version: Moses appointed twelve heads of tribes to scout the land, and dispatched them from the Wilderness of Paran (13:1-17a); the spies toured the entire Promised Land, "from the Wilderness of Zin to the entrance to Hamath (southern Syria)" (13:21); the spies returned and displayed the land's fruit, issuing their report to Moses, Aaron and all the congregation (13:25-26); The report stated that Canaan was not only unconquerable, but a 'land that devours its inhabitants' (13:32-33);The Israelites refused to enter Canaan (14:1a, 2-3); Caleb and Joshua both tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest, but the Israelites responded by calling for them to be stoned (14:6-10a);God was angry and decreed that the Israelites will wander the wilderness for forty years - one year for each day they had spent in scouting the land - until the present sinful generation had died, but Caleb and Joshua would live to enter the Promised Land (14: 26-35).The passage in which Moses struck the rock to bring forth water, in the wilderness of Zin (20:1-11), can only be a retelling of the same story in Exodus 17:1-6, where Moses had already struck the rock to bring forth water, in the wilderness of Sin. Unlike the first case, this time the Lord told Moses to speak to the rock and not to strike it, but Moses struck it twice and water came abundantly. For his disobedience, Moses was told that he would not lead the people into the Promised Land.


Were the spies Moses sent to spy on Canaan opposed to attacking?

In the Book of Numbers, there are two parallel stories of the spies who entered the land of the Canaanites, each representing a different tradition. The spies' reports are slightly different in each case, as are the subsequent events and then God's reaction to the disobedience of the spies and of the Israelites.'Yahwist' versionIn one account, from the Yahwist source, Moses dispatched the spies, who travelled only as far north as Hebron (in the future kingdom of Judah). They issued their report to one person (Moses), stating that the land was 'flowing with milk and honey', but that the inhabitants were giants and and their cities fortified (Numbers 13:27-29). Only Caleb tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest, to which the spies countered that the land was unconquerable (13:30-31,33). The people then refused to enter Canaan and plotted to elect a new captain to lead them back to Egypt (14:1b,4). In this account, the spies not only issued an unfavourable report, but also opposed Caleb's proposal that the conquest proceed, because the land was unconquerable. Note that Joshua plays a very minor role in the Yahwist account.'Priestly' versionIn the second account, from the Priestly source, Moses appointed twelve heads of tribes to scout the land, and they toured the entire Promised Land, 'from the Wilderness of Zin to the entrance to Hamath'. The spies returned and displayed the land's fruit. They issued their report to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation, stating that Canaan was not only unconquerable, but a 'land that devours its inhabitants' (Numbers 13:32-33). Caleb and Joshua both tried to encourage the Israelites to proceed with the conquest, but the Israelites responded by calling for them to be stoned (14:6-10a). In this account, the spies do not directly oppose an invasion, as they do in the Yahwist account, but nevertheless they all died in a plague, all except Joshua and Caleb.In this account, the spies issued an unfavourable report which resulted in the Israelites refusing to attack. They might have gone further in opposing this plan, but the story does not say. Their death in a plague can be read as suggesting that they did actually oppose any invasion of Canaan, and were therefore punished by God for their disobedience.