Want this question answered?
Generally anyone the parole board recognizes as an interested party.
This would be at the parole board's discretion and can happen anytime. Usually if serving a long sentence (20+ years) after the first parole hearing parole may be denied. A parole date can also be taken if the inmate behaves very poorly in prison.
The parole board is not solely responsible for deciding on a violation hearing. This will also come from the people responsible for running the jail, like the warden.
Yes, he mentions her at his Parole Board hearing in 2008
No. He was denied parole at a February 2009 hearing. He is not eligible for another hearing until May 1, 2012 as confirmed by a Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners staff member.
Two ways. Either call your lawyer and ask him/her to set up a parole hearing for you. Or you just wait until the parole board sends you a kite and lets you know that you have a parole date. Just because you have served your minimum sentence though doesnt mean that you are even up for parole or if the parole board even wants to hear your case right now.
According to a representative at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Leslie Van Houten had requested and received a 'Pre-Trial Waiver' for her August 2009 parole hearing. Ms. Van Houten had received the parole hearing postponement by the California Parole Board because of pending legal issues which have not been addressed in court. Leslie Van Houten next parole hearing is scheduled for August 2010.
Simply because it is not a Constitutional requirement. Those facing a parole board are doing so post conviction. The only time a US citizen is guaranteed access to legal representation for any sort of hearing is pre-conviction. Additionally, as an inmate of a state correctional facility, the offender is a ward of the state. It can be argued that the parole hearing is for the benefit of the offender, and the parole board already represents the offender.
That would be highly unlikely. He has a new parole hearing every 2 years, and the parole board hasn't been interested in hearing what he has to say. I suspect that he'll die in prison, and I hope it happens soon.
Leslie Van Houten requested and received a 'pre-trial waiver' from the California Parole Board in March 2009 and had her parole hearing postponed until August 2010. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation indicated that Ms. Van Houten has legal issues pending in court and she wants these legal issues addressed before the next parole hearing.
Generally, violation of a condition of parole means you will have a hearing before the parole board or a special "hearing officer" appointed by the government, and if it is determined during that hearing that you did in fact violate your parole conditions your parole will be revoked and you will go back to prison to serve out the remainder of your term. You'll have a chance at the hearing to defend yourself, but it's kind of hard to argue with a positive drug test.If the parole violation is itself a crime (which it might be for a drug test), then you could ADDITIONALLY face a separate trial and possible sentencing for that, which would be added to your original sentence.
Within thirty days of being violated, the parolee will be reviewed by a committee of the parole board for the violation to determine if a violation did occur and how serious that violation is. However, in most states, the parolee will be reincarcerated until the review takes place. Real answer: Revocation Hearing.