0
The Jews revolted
What else can I help you with?
What happened to the Roman Empire as a result of 207 years of Pax Romana?
Experienced peace and prosperity
What was the result of the conflict of orders?
The conflict of orders in ancient Rome resulted in increased tensions between the patricians (upper class) and plebeians (commoners). Eventually, concessions were made to the plebeians, such as the creation of democratic institutions like the tribunes and the Twelve Tables of Roman Law, to address their grievances.
What happened in 54 BC?
In 54 BC, a significant event in Roman history occurred with the death of Julius Caesar's daughter, Julia, who was married to Pompey the Great. Her passing strained the already fragile alliance between Caesar and Pompey, contributing to the escalating tensions in the Roman Republic. Additionally, in this year, Caesar continued his military campaigns in Gaul, further expanding Roman territory and solidifying his power. These developments set the stage for the eventual civil war between Caesar and Pompey.
What are some important events that happened in between 500 BC and 500 AD?
Roman Empire
What was not a source of tensions between the eastern orthodox church and Roman catholic church?
Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance
How did the Crusades help solidify the split between the Eastern and the Western Churches?
The Fourth Crusade in 1204 AD resulted in the sack of the Eastern Orthodox City of Constantinople by the Roman Catholic crusaders. This increased tensions and caused enormous damage in relations between East and West and solidified the split that happened 150 years earlier in 1054 AD (the Eastern Schism).
What tensions were responsible for weakening of roman republic?
Answer is Answer, we cant change it question. so my answer is answer
What happened to Saint Paul?
He was beheaded under orders from Roman Emperor Nero sometime between AD64 and AD67.
What were the political economic and religious tensions between immigrant Roman Catholics and native born Protestants in the US from the 1830s - 1850s?
do your apush homework..
What event in 800 ce increased tensions between the east and west?
The crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III in 800 CE significantly increased tensions between the Eastern and Western Roman Empires. This act was perceived by the Byzantine Empire, which considered itself the continuation of the Roman Empire, as a direct challenge to its authority and legitimacy. The West's embrace of a new imperial identity under Charlemagne created a rift, as the Eastern Empire viewed itself as the rightful successor to Roman rule. This event marked a deepening divide that would contribute to the eventual schism between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.
In a paragraph explain why there where growing tensions between the Romans and the early christians?
Growing tensions between the Romans and early Christians stemmed from the latter's refusal to worship Roman gods and acknowledge the emperor's divinity, which was seen as a challenge to the traditional Roman religious practices and social order. Christians' exclusivity and their emphasis on a singular God undermined the polytheistic culture and civic duty expected of Roman citizens. Additionally, Christians were often scapegoated for societal problems, leading to persecution and unrest. This conflict ultimately highlighted the clash between emerging religious identities and established political power.
What Event in 800 increased tensions between the east and west What if your mother gave birth to you?
The event that significantly increased tensions between the East and West in 800 AD was the crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III. This act not only symbolized a revival of the Western Roman Empire but also highlighted the growing divide between the Latin West and the Greek East, particularly in terms of religious and political authority. The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) viewed this crowning as a challenge to its legitimacy and sovereignty, further exacerbating the schism between the two branches of Christianity.
