Want this question answered?
Haiti and The Dominican Republic share the island of HispaniolaIndonesia and Papua New Guinea share an island Indonesia and Timor-Leste share an island Canada and Denmark share an island France and the Netherlands share an island The UK and Ireland share an island The UK and Cyprus share an island
== == I Dont Really Know HaHa ---- ---- == == ---- == == ---- == == ---- == ==
They were forced to sell their land.
Technically a huge difference.A share cropper, though he/she did not own the land they were working, had a 'share' in its production. If they did well they got a greater income from the percentage they 'shared'.A slave did not.
Native Americans lived on the same land as the Americans did. They share a lot of cultures,arts,and freedom.
Most remained in debt to the land owners and were unable to move away.
share croppers
They could not afford to buy land, but all they knew was farming. A large number of freed slaves in the South became share croppers, as they could not find other work.
After slaves were freed, they did not have money to buy land or animals to work the land. Many became share croppers and it was much like still being a slave.
Former slaves that had no land or food to provide for themselves or their family. They started working for the whits and planted crops. They only had enough food to feed themselves and there families. The whites go majority of the crops
sharecroppers were farmers who rented land and paid a share of each years crop as rent; they did not own the land they worked.
the whites owned the land while the slaves worked on it and their boss hired them to work there.
Sharecropper is someone who farms land and pays rent for the land using a portion of the crop.
sharecroppers were farmers who rented land and paid a share of each years crop as rented;they did not own the land they worked.
Sharecropping, or share-cropping sounds harmless and benign. In theory tenant ( non-owner) farmers resided and worked on farms and were resposnible for a share of the output= or crop. It sounds benign, like rentals in apartment houses, but in reality was not so even-handed. In effect share-croppers were bound to the land, not by chains or leg-irons ( as in slavery days) but by oppressive contract arrangements- not to different from that of medieval serfs. There were both Black and White share croppers. In theory it sounded benign, in practice it was abusive. There were laws or equivalents of laws in some states that effectively prevented farmers ( both owners and share-croppers, effectively, from changing jobs- with the possible exveption of going into the Armed Forces! ( out of the Frying pan and into the blast Furnace of modern war!) On the other hand the Feds were known to have engaged in various propaganda and educational programs angled at agrarians ( one survival is the the Four-J clubs)- and at times paid farmers NOT to grow crops (in this most labor-intensive job)_ but thiw was done for crop rotation of ( Fallowing) and in more recent times, decontamination of harmful pest control products. so it goes.
If a person stayed too long on a certain land they would have perpetual, or continuing, debt.
sharecropping