0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it true that the roman republic was not much like a constitutional monarchy?
The Roman republic was a republic. There was no monarchy, constitutional or otherwise.
What might have happened if the roman nobles had not overthrown their last king?
The monarchy may have continued, and certainly the tyrannical rule of Tarquinius Superbus would have continued.
What was not a part of the Roman REPBULIC?
Monarchy.
What happened 509 BC in Rome?
In 509 BC the last king of Rome was overthrown in a rebellion because he was a tyrant. The Romans decided to do away with the monarchy and established the Roman Republic to prevent the return of tyranny.
What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?
There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.
What happened to rome in 510 BC?
This is the approximate date for the overthrow of the Monarchy, and the beginning of the Roman Republic.
Where was republic found?
As the name Roman Republic suggests, it was founded in Rome. It happened in 509 BC with the overthrow of the Roman monarchy in Rome.
Explain why the roman people wanted a republic instead of a monarchy?
becouase the republic they have any body or people viewed as a commonwealth
The early roman government was a-?
The early Roman government was a monarchy (for 244 years, 753-509 B.C.).
Is it true that the roman republic was not much like a constitutional monarchy?
The Roman republic was a republic. There was no monarchy, constitutional or otherwise.
What might have happened if the roman nobles had not overthrown their last king?
The monarchy may have continued, and certainly the tyrannical rule of Tarquinius Superbus would have continued.
What are some limitations of the monarchy of the roman republic?
A Republic is not a monarchy, it does not have a king. Several republics were formed when a monarchy was overthrown. The Roman Republic was one such case. They got rid of the kings
What was not a part of the Roman REPBULIC?
Monarchy.
What happened 509 BC in Rome?
In 509 BC the last king of Rome was overthrown in a rebellion because he was a tyrant. The Romans decided to do away with the monarchy and established the Roman Republic to prevent the return of tyranny.
What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?
There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.
How long did the Roman Morachy last?
The Roman monarchy lasted about 243 years.
What was the roman monarchy?
wher the king or queen rules.
