If the entire jury agrees that reasonable doubt exists, they will bring an acquittal or "not guilty" verdict. If, however, only some of the jury can be convinced, a "hung jury" usually results, that is a jury that cannot decide on acquittal or conviction. Occasionally, some of the members of a jury may feel there is reasonable doubt that exists and feel that the charges brought cannot be successfully prosecuted, but that evidence does exist for some sort of conviction and in the event lesser charges can be decided upon, will bring a verdict on the lesser charges. Each state in the US is slightly different.
Yes. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crime charged. If the has a reasonable doubt, then the State has not met the burden of proof required to convict and the jury must acquit. That is the American system.
A petit jury in a criminal trial decides whether or not a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The other type of jury, the Grand Jury, decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to bring charges against a defendant prior to the trial. It does not decide whether or not the defendant is guilty. Therefore the Grand Jury is not bound by the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Because the jury had 'reasonable doubt'.
REASONABLE doubt.
Convince enough members of a jury that they should have reasonable doubt about the facts of the case as the district attorney has presented them.
This is a standard of proof needed in a court of law. You must prove beyond reasonable doubt that someone is guilty for them to be convicted. Here are a couple of sentences.Reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof in a court.Have you proved beyond reasonable doubt that my client is guilty?
A judge or jury must reach the decision that the defendant is guilty beyond a REASONABLE doubt. Not beyond ALL doubt - just "reasonable" doubt.
They must determine that the state has proven it's case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Reasonable doubt means not being sure of a criminal defendant's guilt to a moral certainty. A member of the jury must be convinced of the defendant’s guilt.
The defense tries to create doubt in the minds of the jury.
The defense tries to create doubt in the minds of the jury.
The defense tries to create doubt in the minds of the jury.