Want this question answered?
Actually a court of appeals cannot decide that. A court of appeals can only decide whether or not the trial court correctly followed procedures and existing legal precedence. It is entirely possible for procedures and legal precedence to be completely unfair (they have been many times) but if the trial court properly followed them, the court of appeals must support the trial court's decision. If the court of appeals decides that the trial court failed to follow procedures and/or existing legal precedent, then the case must be retried in a trial court.
The appeals court
To make a complaint about an unfair judge, you can contact the appropriate judicial conduct commission or board in your region. Provide specific examples and evidence of the judge's unfair behavior in your complaint. It's important to follow the correct procedures and guidelines outlined by the commission for processing complaints against judges.
Federal Judges shoulder great responsibility. They must balance the rights of individuals with the interests of the nation as a whole. Often they are forced to make decisions that seem fair to one side but unfair to the other.
The open economic system is the one that allows business owners decide what to sell and at what price. This is usually quite unfair for the consumers.
That's not a possibility. Judges issue warrants based upon the information supplied to them by the lead detective of the case
In an appeals case, judges decide whether the lower court made any legal errors that affected the outcome of the case. They can affirm the lower court's decision, reverse it, remand it back to the lower court for further proceedings, or modify the ruling.
It is unfair.
It was unfair for him to be punished for something he didn't do.
you just did =) this is unfair treatment. that game is unfair
unfair
This is what is known as 'an unfair exchange'. Such situations are usually settled by both parties submitting to binding arbitration.