Actually a court of appeals cannot decide that.
A court of appeals can only decide whether or not the trial court correctly followed procedures and existing legal precedence. It is entirely possible for procedures and legal precedence to be completely unfair (they have been many times) but if the trial court properly followed them, the court of appeals must support the trial court's decision.
If the court of appeals decides that the trial court failed to follow procedures and/or existing legal precedent, then the case must be retried in a trial court.
They send the case back ("remand it') to the trial court for a new trial with instructions on what was done wrong.
When the judges on a court of appeals decide a trial was unfair, they can request a new trial.
The appeals court
Federal Judges shoulder great responsibility. They must balance the rights of individuals with the interests of the nation as a whole. Often they are forced to make decisions that seem fair to one side but unfair to the other.
The open economic system is the one that allows business owners decide what to sell and at what price. This is usually quite unfair for the consumers.
That's not a possibility. Judges issue warrants based upon the information supplied to them by the lead detective of the case
It is unfair.
you just did =) this is unfair treatment. that game is unfair
It was unfair for him to be punished for something he didn't do.
In an appeals case, judges decide whether the lower court made any legal errors that affected the outcome of the case. They can affirm the lower court's decision, reverse it, remand it back to the lower court for further proceedings, or modify the ruling.
unfair
This is what is known as 'an unfair exchange'. Such situations are usually settled by both parties submitting to binding arbitration.
For state judges, there should be a state Commission on Judicial Conduct in your state. Try an online search using your state + judicial conduct. A complaint regarding a federal judge begins with filing a complaint on a special form with the clerk of the federal court of appeals for your jurisdiction.
Yes. I think that results of talent contests should be decided by judges and not the audience as the audience will only support their own idols. They will vote for them and think that their idols should be the ones who can win the contests. This will results to having some people who don't actually have the talents to win the contests. Thus, these contests will be counted as unfair.