In order to pose your question, you've invented an irresistible force, which can't
exist, and an immovable object, which also can't exist. You're doing so well with
fiction, you might as well go ahead and postulate a result as well.
Ricochet. Force changes direction.
The strong force will hit the object and may or may notmove it depending on what the 2 objects are. An example would be if the strongest force was the sun and the unmovable object was the earth then the planet would burn up and we would all DIE.
This scenario presents a paradox, as an unstoppable object would not be able to be stopped by any force, while an immovable object cannot be moved by any force. In reality, such objects cannot coexist within the same universe.
well, to put it simply neither would win. Its a Paradox.
This scenario presents a logical paradox because if the force is truly unstoppable, then it should be able to move any object regardless of its immovability. However, if the object is truly unmovable, then no force, not even an unstoppable one, should be able to move it. This dilemma illustrates the limitations of our understanding of physics and the concept of infinity.
Obviously you can't have both an unstoppable force and an immovable object. If the force moves the object, then the object isn't unmovable. If the force doesn't move it, then the force isn't unstoppable.
I am not quite sure what you mean with "fixed". If you mean the object is fixed in its position, or unmovable, such a thing doesn't exist in the real world. Whenever a force acts on an object, its movement will change, according to Newton's Second Law (acceleration = force / mass).
The object will accelerate.
The object will not move!!!
The object will accelerate.
The object will accelerate.
The acceleration increases.