Assuming you are asking what has a shorter wavelength 1 Mhz or 1 Ghz, then the answer is 1 Ghz. But the way the question was phrased, Mhz or Ghz, well 1000 Mhz is = 1 GHz. Note that 1 hz is just 1 cycle/sec. 1 Mhz is 1,000,000 cycles/sec and 1 Ghz is 1,000,000,000 cycles/sec.
So to fit 1000 cycles in one second (as compared to 1 cycle in a second) the cycles have to be shorter (faster up and down sinusoidal wave).
A wave with a frequency in the GHz range has a shorter wavelength compared to a wave in the MHz range. This is because wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional: as frequency increases, wavelength decreases.
The full wave length of 10 MHz is 30 metres.
MHz and GHz are a measure of frequency. In science frequency = 1/time for one cycle. If a wave takes 0.5 seconds to complete a wave, the frequency is 2 Hz. MHz and GHz in computers measure the same thing. It measures the frequency of the processor (ie, how many cycles it completes in a set time) again, if each cycles takes 0.5 seconds, then your computing speed is 2 Hz. a GHz (giga hertz) is equal to 1000 Mhz (mega hertz) a MHz is equal to 1,000,000 Hz. how is mhz and ghz is measured?
MHz. 1000 MHz = 1 GHz.
There is about 1.04 GHz in 1066 MHz.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
It takes exactly 1000 MHz to equal 1 GHz http://www.google.com/search?q=1+GHz+in+MHz&btnG
There are 1,000 megahertz (MHz) in 1 gigahertz (GHz). Therefore, to convert 6 GHz to MHz, you multiply 6 by 1,000. This means that 6 GHz is equal to 6,000 MHz.
It isn't a GHz yet... you need 1024 MHz to make 1 Ghz
1 GHz = 1,000 MHz.
The frequency with the shortest wavelength would be 100 GHz. Wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, meaning higher frequencies have shorter wavelengths. So, 100 GHz would have a shorter wavelength compared to 1 GHz, 100 MHz, and 10 MHz.
2990 MHz