Assuming you are asking what has a shorter wavelength 1 Mhz or 1 Ghz, then the answer is 1 Ghz. But the way the question was phrased, Mhz or Ghz, well 1000 Mhz is = 1 GHz. Note that 1 hz is just 1 cycle/sec. 1 Mhz is 1,000,000 cycles/sec and 1 Ghz is 1,000,000,000 cycles/sec.
So to fit 1000 cycles in one second (as compared to 1 cycle in a second) the cycles have to be shorter (faster up and down sinusoidal wave).
A wave with a frequency in the GHz range has a shorter wavelength compared to a wave in the MHz range. This is because wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional: as frequency increases, wavelength decreases.
The full wave length of 10 MHz is 30 metres.
MHz. 1000 MHz = 1 GHz.
MHz and GHz are a measure of frequency. In science frequency = 1/time for one cycle. If a wave takes 0.5 seconds to complete a wave, the frequency is 2 Hz. MHz and GHz in computers measure the same thing. It measures the frequency of the processor (ie, how many cycles it completes in a set time) again, if each cycles takes 0.5 seconds, then your computing speed is 2 Hz. a GHz (giga hertz) is equal to 1000 Mhz (mega hertz) a MHz is equal to 1,000,000 Hz. how is mhz and ghz is measured?
There is about 1.04 GHz in 1066 MHz.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
It takes exactly 1000 MHz to equal 1 GHz http://www.google.com/search?q=1+GHz+in+MHz&btnG
It isn't a GHz yet... you need 1024 MHz to make 1 Ghz
1 GHz = 1,000 MHz.
2990 MHz
The frequency with the shortest wavelength would be 100 GHz. Wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, meaning higher frequencies have shorter wavelengths. So, 100 GHz would have a shorter wavelength compared to 1 GHz, 100 MHz, and 10 MHz.
1900 MHz