Want this question answered?
Lamark believed that behaviors learned by parents could become inheritable traits.
Both what is in your genes and the environment produce various personality traits.
Finding out how exactly traits are passed on to offspring - with variation - filled in a gap in the understanding of evolution that Darwin pioneered. Darwin did not know or understand how it could come to be that traits propagated through the generations with only minor variations, without blending. He could only assume that there was some mechanism that facilitated this propagation. His fear was that further research into genetics would show that sexual reproduction blends traits. Had that been the case, then evolutionary theory would have been falsified. In stead, what we learned about genetics - starting with Mendel, and culminating in the findings of Watson and Crick - confirmed what we'd learned about evolution in great detail.
have learned
No. It is a subject to be looked at and learned about. If it can be embraced, so much the better. We have a lot of things that we can do with it. Certainly no genetic disease can be cured without it. And its promises are blindingly bright. But it can be misused or abused. And with the advent of genetically engineered critters for biological warfare, it may kill us all. Love it, or hate it, there is no reason not to learn all you can about it. And it is easier to learn about something you don't hate than something you do.
shyness, heredity, learned,
he became the father of the genetics; i would hope he would have learned about genetics and how to trace them back.
This is the psychological nature vs nurture concept. A learned behavior is considered nurture, you arent born with it therefore its learned. An instinct however is considered nature because you were born with it and it is in your genes. In other words an instinct would be something you are predispositioned to by heredity. With animals this would also have to do with natural selection. They carry on genes that help them survive, ie instincts. Amanda
It would be a combination of genetics and learned behavior.
This is the psychological nature vs nurture concept. A learned behavior is considered nurture, you arent born with it therefore its learned. An instinct however is considered nature because you were born with it and it is in your genes. In other words an instinct would be something you are predispositioned to by heredity. With animals this would also have to do with natural selection. They carry on genes that help them survive, ie instincts. Amanda
They have learned that schizophrenia has a strong genetic component, but that there are also other factors than genetics involved.
all i know is that its False
different species originated from other species
They adapt and evolve through the process of natural selection and learned behaviours.
They adapt and evolve through the process of natural selection and learned behaviours.
darwin first learned about genetics by studying pea plants he was a monk in a monistary in australia that where he learned about plants and animals and how they got their features (i just studied this, SPOKEN FROM A REAL 12 YEAR OLD!!)
Because there is lots more to be learned about it. And because some of that knowledge may be useful to us in more direct ways.