answersLogoWhite

0

civil rights acts

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the supreme court apply the intent of the fourteenth amendment after the slaughterhouse cases changed it?

It used the due process clause.


Is the idea of separate but equal facilities consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment?

The idea of separate but equal facilities is not consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law. The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) overturned the precedent set by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) by declaring that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal, thus violating the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling emphasized that segregation in public education created a sense of inferiority among marginalized groups, contradicting the amendment's intent to promote equality.


What was the intent of the 18th amendment?

to repeal prohibition


What was the original intent of the amendment?

The original intent of the 14th amendment was to make all people who were born in the US citizens. It originally was meant to protect African American slaves who were born in the US.


Incorporation doctrine in a sentence?

Total incorporation (sometimes called "mechanical incorporation" or "complete incorporation") would apply the first eight amendments of the Bill of Rights (the Ninth and Tenth aren't individual rights; the Ninth isn't triable) to the states as a single unit via the Fourteenth Amendment, as some constitutional scholars argue was the original intent. The US Supreme Court has elected to use a process called selective incorporation, which applies individual clauses to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, as needed.


How did the US Supreme Court reassert power after the Civil War?

The Supreme Court interpreted the meaning of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments in a manner incompatible with the apparent intent of Congress in order to maintain the status quo of social order in the South. By declaring the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional (e.g., Civil Rights Cases, 109 US 3 (1883)), denying Congress the right to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment (despite the language of that Amendment), and refusing to apply anti-discrimination laws to the states or private citizens, the Court shaped and controlled policies that allowed discriminatory practices and state laws to flourish.


After the slaughterhouse can you change the intent of the 14th amendment how did the Supreme Court apply it?

It used the due process clause.


What act of Congress was enacted in 1919 in order to enforce the18th amendment?

The Volstead Act was the act of congress that was enacted in 1919 in order to enforce the 18th amendment. The Volstead Act was enacted to carry out the intent of the 18th Amendment.


How does justice brown view the fourtheenth amendment?

Justice Brown viewed the Fourteenth Amendment primarily through the lens of its original intent and its application to civil rights. He believed that it was designed to secure the rights of newly freed slaves but was cautious about extending its protections beyond that initial scope. In his opinions, he often emphasized a limited interpretation of the Amendment, arguing that it should not be used to impose broader social changes or enforce economic rights. This perspective reflected a more conservative approach to issues of equality and civil liberties during his tenure on the Supreme Court.


What was the goal of the seventh amendment?

The intent of the authors was to codify the right to a jury trial in certain civic trials. This amendment was not extended to states by the supreme court in the 14th amendment, unlike most components of the Bill of Rights. :Edit by Perfectmew: This amendment gives citizens the right to protect their items and properties.


How does the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment differ from the due process clause in the Fifth Amendment?

the clause in the fourteenth amendment has been interpreted to mean that state government must provide some of the protections in the bill of rights


Historians are not interested in the original intent or purpose of a source since that information has no bearing on its historical value true or false?

false