0
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
What legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWhat legend? A legend is a story from the past that is believed to be historical but cannot be verified. A legend can be based upon any historical fact. For example, the legend of Romulus and Remus. Now there could actually have been twin brothers who were active in the founding of Rome, but there is no historical proof of this. The same is for the legend of Hercules. It is possible that there actually was a strong man who did some of the "labors" and the legend grew from there. King Arther is another legendary figure who more than likely was a historical figure and his works embellished into a legend.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between a legend and a fact?
A legend is a traditional story or myth that may not be based on historical events, while a fact is a statement that can be proven true through evidence or data. Legends often contain elements of exaggeration or fiction, whereas facts are based on verifiable information.
When will King Arthur rise again?
The legend of King Arthur is a mythological tale, so the idea of his return is not based on historical fact. There is no specific date or event associated with his prophecy.
What is a legend yes does anyone know what a legend is then if you do write back?
A legend is a traditional historical tale (or collection of related tales) popularly regarded as true but usually containing a mixture of fact and fiction.
What historical facts was the legend of Dracula based on?
None whatsoever. That some people are incredibly depraved and do horrendous things is a fact. Then authors turn and mould stories to suit their purposes. Vampires are things of fiction, of fun.
What is another word for fact based?
biographical, factual, nonfiction, true, fact-based, realistic, authentic, historical, real, true-life, reference,
Which fact is true about lady macbeth?
She is based on a historical person called Gruoch.
Is a vampire a human being?
They are mythological, but supposed to be based on immortal human beings and legend comes from a human historical figure
What is the play Julius Caesar based on?
Historical fact, as outlined in the book Plutarch's Lives.
Is Finn McCool a Historical Character or Character from a legend?
legend
What is an antonym for legend the kind in a map?
The antonym of legend is 'Fact'.
What is the Disney movie Hercules based on?
well i only know 1 fact and that is that Zeuse is his dad in both
Was Sir Lancelot a fact or a legend?
Legend
