Want this question answered?
"Inheritance of acquired traits", one of the implications of this would be that if an individual broke a bone and it did not heal correctly then that individual's children would likely be born with this "new acquired trait" of that bone already broken and improperly healed instead of having a normal bone in that location.
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
he sugested that organisms could change during their lifetimesby selectively using or not using various parts of ther bodies. he also suggested that individuals could pass the acquired traits on to their offspring enabling species to change over time...that is how Lamarck paved the way for future biologists
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck suggested an idea that Darwin would later expand upon. Lamarck suggested that any changes a creature underwent during its lifetime would be passed down to the offspring. He also believed unused parts would just go away over time, due to this.
a fossil
Use and Disuse Theory
It isn't. Lamarck was well off the mark; Darwin had the right idea and was later shown to be right (or at least better than Lamarck) by the discovery of DNA and its function.
"Inheritance of acquired traits", one of the implications of this would be that if an individual broke a bone and it did not heal correctly then that individual's children would likely be born with this "new acquired trait" of that bone already broken and improperly healed instead of having a normal bone in that location.
Claudius Ptolemy, an Egyptian astronomer, mathematician, and geographer, proposed the geocentric model around 140 B.C.The geocentric model states that the Earth exists at the center of the universe and everything else revolves around it. This was later shown incorrect by multiple other astronomers, such as Galileo, and proposed the more correct Heliocentric model.
Atoms revolve in fixed orbit is incorrect. Later, concept of orbitals was given.
A hypothesis is a temporary explanation for some observation. It is then tested and, if is found to be incorrect, a new one has to be formed. If found to be correct, it becomes a theory. If that theory is later found to have a counter-example it is modified (hypothesis -> theory - same process) or a completely new hypothesis proposed and tested. The hypothesis alwasy comes before the theory. it is a practical explanation that the scientist develops that accounts for a theory.
Atoms revolve in fixed orbit is incorrect. Later, concept of orbitals was given.
The founding fathers did not propose the 27th amendment. They were dead by that time. I found out from my teacher that it was a trick questions.
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
he sugested that organisms could change during their lifetimesby selectively using or not using various parts of ther bodies. he also suggested that individuals could pass the acquired traits on to their offspring enabling species to change over time...that is how Lamarck paved the way for future biologists
he sugested that organisms could change during their lifetimesby selectively using or not using various parts of ther bodies. he also suggested that individuals could pass the acquired traits on to their offspring enabling species to change over time...that is how Lamarck paved the way for future biologists
Lamarck's explanation of evolution is based on two principles: use and disuse and the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Lamarck's "use and disuse" principle explained his belief that the body parts that are commonly used become larger and stronger such as a giraffe's neck, while those that are not used deteriorate and become smaller. He also believed that an organism could pass these modifications to its offspring through the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Thus, Lamarck thought that evolution is driven by the innate drive of organisms to become more complex. Although he was later proven wrong, he was insightful in observing and recognizing that gradual evolutionary change does exist.