If a US Supreme Court justice has a conflict of interest with regard to a case being heard by the Court, he (or she) should recuse (disqualify, not participate) himself. While this is considered the best course of action, justices are not required to recuse themselves; the decision is voluntary.
There have been times when justices sat on cases in which they had a conflict of interest, raising complaints from other members of the court and general public, but there is no remedy for the problem at the moment.
President Johnson appointed Justice Abe Fortas to the US Supreme Court in 1965. He resigned in 1969 due to a conflict of interest.
Absolutely not; that would be a conflict of interest and a breach of ethics that would not be permitted by the courts. If the case ever reached the US Supreme Court on appeal, and the the justice was, for some reason, still a member of the Court, he (or she) would be expected to recuse himself from participating in the case.
Associate Justice is the formal title for any US Supreme Court justice who is not the Chief Justice. There are eight Associate Justices and one Chief Justice on the Supreme Court.
No. Recusal (disqualifying oneself from a case) for conflict of interest is a voluntary action; justices cannot be penalized for refusing to do so. Unfortunately, this has lead to situations where justices have heard -- and voted on -- cases in which they should not have been involved.
Thurgood Marshall's careers were an attorney and A Supreme Court Justice .
The Chief Justice presides over the US Supreme Court. At present, the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court is John G. Roberts, Jr.
Yes. The Chief Justice leads or "presides over" the Supreme Court.
Samuel Chase was the only supreme court justice to be impeached.
They are called supreme court justice
until they die
There are 5 Wyoming Supreme Court Justices.
The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court is John G. Roberts.