This is theoretically possible, and at some points in history, so-called "faithless electors" did in fact break their own pledge to vote for a certain candidate, and instead voted for someone else; some sources say that this has happened with presidential electors more than 150 times over the centuries, but it did not affect the final outcome.
Such exceptions are rare, however, since it has become a custom that when a state awards its electoral votes to a presidential candidate, the expectation is the electors will cast their (largely symbolic) votes for that person; many electors are selected by their political party, so they understand how the procedure is supposed to work, and most go along with it. Interestingly, there are twenty-one states in which the electors are not obligated to do that. I enclose a link to a thorough list of state laws about electors, and which ones are not bound by anything other than custom or tradition.
Al Gore
George Bush became president because of the vote in the electoral college, despite not winning a plurality of the popular vote
obama has won
Andrew Jackson is the presidential candidate who won the popular vote in the 1824 election but failed to secure the presidency. Despite winning the highest number of popular votes, Jackson did not have the majority needed in the electoral college, and the election was ultimately decided by the House of Representatives, who chose John Quincy Adams as the president. This outcome is often referred to as the "corrupt bargain" because Adams appointed Henry Clay, who had supported him, as his Secretary of State.
No.
something happens
barack obama is winning for sure.mitt romney is not winning
barack obama
Mitt Romney
ford
with a pen
No. At the time this question was asked, the Presidential General Election had not yet taken place.