There would be no carbon emissions. Nuclear power does not contribute to global warming.
You have a misapprehension there, it is uranium oxide that is used in fuel rods, not fossil fuel
Nuclear fuel is the fuel used to produce nuclear energy.
The fuel rods used in a nuclear reactor are made from uranium 235(U-235).
It is Uranium
Uranium
Uranium is not a fossil fuel; uranium is used as nuclear fuel for nuclear power reactors.
Nuclear energy is not a fossil fuel or any fuel at all. Radiation is used to create energy. The energy is "the Fuel" petroleum
Fossil fuels are not used in nuclear power stations. Nuclear fuel is used (uranium)
Uranium is used moreso because it is in fact NOT a fossil fuel. It is a heavy metal mined from an ore, and it's energy process is call nuclear fission.
With fossil fuels we burn them to produce heat. With nuclear fuel we produce a nuclear chain reaction in a reactor which produces heat. Using the heat to produce electricity is the same for both types of fuel.
Fuel that can be used instead of fossil fuel :BiodieselBioAlcoholBattery as fuel (electric fuel cells)HydrogenArtificially produced combustible hydrocarbons [methane, butane,etc]Compressed Air
You have a misapprehension there, it is uranium oxide that is used in fuel rods, not fossil fuel
No substitute for nuclear power reactors especially if there is no available fossil fuel.
Fossil fuel may be used in the production of biofuels.
The fuel can be fossil fuel, ie coal oil,or natural gas, or it can be uranium in nuclear plants.
No. Nuclear power plants use a uranium to provide the heat to generate electricity from. By splitting the nuclei of uranium atoms (called nuclear fission), energy is released, which will be used for electricity generation. Uranium is a radioactive metal, not a fossil fuel.
They are hydrocarbons which burn with oxygen