Want this question answered?
Yes afcourse the indian freedom fighter was a good
The first amendment (known as the Bill of Rights) was a compromise between Federalist states and Anti-Federalist states, therefore allowing the new Constitution to be passed. Anti-Federalist wanted rights and restrictions to be put on the Constitution because there was no guarantee to them. Federalists argued that the rights listed were implied. Obviously the Anti-Federalists got what they wanted.
It limited freedom of speech
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
As in like during the African American movement? Freedom.
When a Government imposes restriction on the free movement,freedom of expression of its citizens, these will definitely be considered as human rights violation by the Government.
Bhagat Singh is considered one of the last martyrs of the Indian freedom movement. He was executed by the British colonial government in 1931 for his involvement in the struggle for India's independence. His sacrifice and bravery inspired generations of Indians in their fight for freedom.
Russia elects its leaders democratically and the current (2009) government is certainly a popular, legitimate government. However, at present it appears (from the outside) that the government/authorities seem to suppress any dissenting public demonstrations and censer the press quite actively. On this basis one would have to conclude that, while the people of Russia have a democratic government, they do not have freedom of speech.
Chicago Freedom Movement happened in 1967.
Freedom Movement of Iran was created in 1961.
World Kashmir Freedom Movement was created in 1990.
National Socialist Freedom Movement ended in 1925.
National Socialist Freedom Movement was created in 1924.
freedom of movement
S. Girija has written: 'Freedom movement in India' -- subject(s): History, Nationalism, Politics and government
No. That was lost when we accepted the idea that the government had a right to require a license to drive. If the state has a right to license, then they have the right to withhold the privilege.
The same way they always do, they threaten dissenters with prison or death.