yes it should. transpareny only uses about 40MB
if it isnt satellite or dsl then yes its an amazing speed for any online game
you can sell a Ps3 40GB for atleast £135 In the USA that would be at the most and in dollars, getting more than $100 would only be in trade
Well the random back access data in java scrpit is about 40mb difference on the downloading side so, the fact that you can transfer the dynamic memory status and program the HUD is far better than if you where to use the ram-resitors on 3d, simple really.
Download and reinstall your XP version (2.1) of Windows Movie Maker. It sounds like your current version is corrupt (not working correctly).
For a feature phone: yes, the average is actually between 25 MB and 80 MB. For a smartphone: no. Almost every smartphone has 1 or more GB, and the average for a smartphone is even 8 GB.
this is entirely dependant on the size of file your camera generates. I shoot with a 10.2 MP camera in RAW/DNG format and 64 meg might hold two images. It also depends on what type picture you're shooting (uncompressed or compressed) I just got a new 14.1 mp camera, and I can take about 5-7 pictures if they're compressed on the camera's 40mb internal memory...
It connects eternal device, connects power supply to analyze data.-Small computer system interface.-for peripheral devices connectivity (8 devices (0-7))-Internal and external buses like power supply and extensive peripherals.-Ultra SCSI - 32 devices (no wire is required, all with is uses is wireless).-Physical drive accession - (Single hard dish is physical drive).-Logical drive accession.-SCSI ID is available in the device.Configuration done in booting.-5MB/Sec.-SCSI: 2--Fast SCSI - 10MB/Sec.--Wide SCSI - 16bit 20MB/Sec.-SCSI: 3--Support 32 device - 40MB/Sec.Note: the above answer is in the form of points.
Not exactly what you've asked, but anyway: December 1991 I purchased in Perth at Myers an Amstrad 286 PC, for about $1900 Australian. It had a 40Mb HDD, 16Mhz CPU, 14 inch monitor, and a five and an a quarter plus a three and half FDD, and about one or two Meg RAM if I recall correctly.
The quick answer is that it takes less space than the raw wav file it was made to replace. Studies show that humans can perceive only a small percentage of the total data contained in a WAV file. As studies continued, they determined they could reduce the file size, without reducing the apparent quality of the sound. This is accomplished through compression. The compression reduces the amount of space needed to store the file. So an original WAV file may take 40MB of space, but the compressed MP3 will need only 4MB. (Of course, every song is different, so these numbers are just examples.) This means more songs can fit in the memory of an MP3 player. There is a lot of discussion among purists about the quality of the sound. Some people can hear a difference, some can not.
It connects eternal device, connects power supply to analyze data.-Small computer system interface.-for peripheral devices connectivity (8 devices (0-7))-Internal and external buses like power supply and extensive peripherals.-Ultra SCSI - 32 devices (no wire is required, all with is uses is wireless).-Physical drive accession - (Single hard dish is physical drive).-Logical drive accession.-SCSI ID is available in the device.Configuration done in booting.-5MB/Sec.-SCSI: 2--Fast SCSI - 10MB/Sec.--Wide SCSI - 16bit 20MB/Sec.-SCSI: 3--Support 32 device - 40MB/Sec.Note: the above answer is in the form of points.
In terms of audio quality, CD carries better quality than MP3 as it does not compress the audio data. MP3 files use compression techniques to reduce the file size by 50% up to 95% or even more. MP3 compression normally does a good job at compressing the files but the compression will always lose quality. Sometimes, the loss of quality is not noticed but as the amount of compression increases, so the more obvious the losses become. MP3 files take up far less space with a typical song size of 4MB compared to a CD format song taking around 40MB