Want this question answered?
He is both depending how you look at it. He is a robber baron in the sense that he made a lot of money, created a monopoly, bought all the steel companies, and bought all the iron companies and paid his workers very little. But on the other hand he is a captain of the industry because he thought of something so revolutionary and something that changed the world and how things work forever and was a great innovator. He also gave back a lot by making Carnegie Hall in NYC and making many colleges, one being in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania. That is ironic since it's the steel city.
They both give out loans
they were both males
Classic and social entrepreneurs are similar in that they are both entrepreneurs. Both of them aim to achieve specific goals in addition to profits. Business entrepreneurs however measure their profits in returns.
The term "autocratic" refers to a type of leadership style. An "autocrat" is similar to a "despot" in that they both rule with absolute power.
Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller were both titans of the American industrial era in the late 19th century. They were both extremely wealthy businessmen who built their fortunes in the steel and oil industries, respectively. Both men were also known for their philanthropic efforts, with Carnegie establishing libraries and Rockefeller funding medical research and education.
Similarities between John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie include their immense wealth and success in the business world, both being leading figures in the Gilded Age of American industrialization. Differences include their primary industries: Rockefeller was in oil with his Standard Oil Company, while Carnegie was in steel with Carnegie Steel Company. Additionally, Carnegie was known for his philanthropy, while Rockefeller faced more criticism for his business practices.
Both Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller were titans of industry during the Gilded Age in the late 19th century, known for their immense wealth and influence. Both men made their fortunes in different industries - Carnegie in steel and Rockefeller in oil. Carnegie was a proponent of philanthropy and funded the establishment of public libraries, while Rockefeller focused on creating a systematic approach to his philanthropy through the Rockefeller Foundation.
Carnegie and Rockefeller donated a lot of their money to public improvement projects. Also, they donated the money to charity. They did it out of philanthropy and out of good will.
Both Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller were wealthy industrialists who dominated their respective industries (Carnegie in steel, Rockefeller in oil) during the late 19th century. They were both known for their ruthless business tactics and amassed significant fortunes through their business ventures. Additionally, both men were philanthropists and donated large sums of money to various charitable causes and institutions.
Andrew Carnegie's biggest rival was John D. Rockefeller, who was a prominent American businessman and one of the wealthiest individuals in history. Both Carnegie and Rockefeller were tycoons in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with Carnegie dominating the steel industry and Rockefeller controlling the oil industry.
They were both Captains of Industry during the Industrial Boom in America. Carnegie made steel Rockefeller made oil
both grew up poor, influicia men, buissness mean and philanthropists
Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish-American industrialist who led the expansion of the American steel industry in the late 19th century. John D. Rockefeller was an American business magnate who founded the Standard Oil Company in 1870 and revolutionized the petroleum industry. Both Carnegie and Rockefeller were among the wealthiest individuals in their time and known for their philanthropic efforts.
they both we rich people who can to the united states. one owned the steel compines in pensilvainya and one owned oil refineres out west. but both were rich
Both Boss Tweed and industrial moguls like Carnegie and Rockefeller held significant power and influence in their respective fields during the late 19th century in the United States. They amassed wealth and used their influence to control politics and business operations. Additionally, they were known for their monopolistic practices and strategies to expand their wealth and power.
both Andrew