Want this question answered?
They cannot be because of errors that can be made by the measurer, calibration of instruments.
Because the Central Limit Theorem says so. Proof of the CLT does require some advanced mathematical knowledge.
No. For a percentage, both measurements must be expressed in the same units.
more probable most probable
probable is an adjective
It is impossible to make measurements with only some atoms; as a metal copernicium is very probable a conductor.
You think probable to a determinatiom.
Probable 9 %.
Any errors; probable you think to the deliquescence of zinc chloride.
Mendelevium is very probable a conductor, as all metals, but measurements are impossible with only some atoms.
They cannot be because of errors that can be made by the measurer, calibration of instruments.
C. A. Padgham has written: 'Subjective limitations on physical measurements' -- subject(s): Physical measurements, Scientific Errors
Directly, neither. However, if you know the true value you can calculate the range.
Air humidity measurements are based on the water content of the air, expressed as volume percentage: Relative Humidity = percentage of saturation at a given temperature Absolute Humidity = percentage of water in the air, regardless of saturation or temperature. The humidity that is talked about in weather reports, is relative humidity.
Probable you think to the evaporation during measurements.
Errors in the experimental determination of the number of manual pages can arise from factors like inconsistent measurement techniques, human error in counting or recording the pages, environmental conditions affecting the readability of the pages, or equipment limitations impacting the accuracy of the count. It is important to minimize these errors through proper calibration, controls, and repeated measurements.
David Karo has written: 'Electrical measurements and the calculation of the errors involved'