answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is Percentage probable errors in measurements?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is copernicium conductive?

It is impossible to make measurements with only some atoms; as a metal copernicium is very probable a conductor.


What is the measurements and observations collected during an investigation are called?

You think probable to a determinatiom.


When freshwater freezes the volume of the original water increases by what percentage?

Probable 9 %.


What errors can occur when doing experimental formation of zinc chloride?

Any errors; probable you think to the deliquescence of zinc chloride.


Is mendelevium a better conductor or insulator?

Mendelevium is very probable a conductor, as all metals, but measurements are impossible with only some atoms.


Is measurements can be exact?

They cannot be because of errors that can be made by the measurer, calibration of instruments.


What has the author C A Padgham written?

C. A. Padgham has written: 'Subjective limitations on physical measurements' -- subject(s): Physical measurements, Scientific Errors


Does percentage error describe the range or the values for a set percentage or measurements?

Directly, neither. However, if you know the true value you can calculate the range.


What are humidity measurements based upon?

Air humidity measurements are based on the water content of the air, expressed as volume percentage: Relative Humidity = percentage of saturation at a given temperature Absolute Humidity = percentage of water in the air, regardless of saturation or temperature. The humidity that is talked about in weather reports, is relative humidity.


If the volume of the water could be measured very accurately there would still be uncertainty in the mass of the wate. What source of error have we not taken in account?

Probable you think to the evaporation during measurements.


Can you explain the probable source of errors in the experimental determination of the number of manual pages?

Errors in the experimental determination of the number of manual pages can arise from factors like inconsistent measurement techniques, human error in counting or recording the pages, environmental conditions affecting the readability of the pages, or equipment limitations impacting the accuracy of the count. It is important to minimize these errors through proper calibration, controls, and repeated measurements.


What has the author David Karo written?

David Karo has written: 'Electrical measurements and the calculation of the errors involved'