How can an infant be involved in a valid and binding contract?
The term young person is used here to refer to anyone under the
age of 18 years (s.3 Age of Majority Act 1977 (Vic) and s3 age of
Majority Act 1973 (Tas) ). Sometimes legal writing refers to minors
or infant.
The exact capacity of young people to bind themselves and be
bound by contract is limited but also unclear, because no Act of
Parliament completely covers this area of law. The Supreme Court
Act 1986 (Vic) in sections 49 to 51, "Contracts of Minors", is the
most useful reference on this question.
Binding contracts and young people
Contracts for the supply of "necessaries" will generally be
binding. There are no hard and fast rules to identify what is "a
necessary", but it does include the sorts of things the young
person needs to live a reasonable lifestyle. It includes basics
such as:
food;
clothing;
a place to live;
medicine,
and so on.
It will also include any contracts relating to the young
person's education, apprenticeship or something very similar, if it
can be shown to be of benefit to the young person. While a court
has not yet considered the issue specifically, mobile phones are
probably not necessaries.
The young person contracting in this situation will be held
bound to pay a reasonable price (although that may not be the
contract price) for necessaries actually sold and delivered.
("Delivery" is a technical term. Generally, delivery takes place
when the seller has given the buyer the power to take the goods
away.) Where necessaries have been sold but there has been no
delivery, the young person does not have to take delivery or pay
for the goods.
Non-binding contracts and young people (Supreme Court Act 1986
(Vic) s49 and s50)
Two classes of contracts are not binding on a young person,
namely:
contracts which are not for necessaries; and
contracts for the repayment of money lent or to be lent (that
is, any form of credit contract).
Where a young person has already paid money under a non-binding
contract, that money will not be recoverable unless no benefit has
been received by the young person. The young person can, however,
refuse to make any further payments under the contract. It is not
certain who then owns goods that are not necessaries. It appears
that they become the property of the young person unless the young
person has fraudulently misrepresented their age.
Even after turning 18, a person cannot confirm a prior contract
and then become bound by it. Any money paid by a young person under
such circumstances may be recovered.