If the net force is zero, then the forces are balanced. If the net force is not zero, then the forces are not balanced. You can have a balanced pair of forces, but not a pair of balanced forces.
"Balanced" refers to forces, not to velocities or speeds. If an object is at terminal SPEED, the FORCES on it are balanced.
balenced
If the forces are balanced, then by definition the sum of the forces is zero.
A balanced force is either not moving or at a constant velocity
TX Const. Article 8, Section 49a(b) requires it to be balanced.
This site will give you information on a balanced diet and information on calories and sample meals http://caloriecount.about.com/article/what_is_a_balanced_diet
Keheller's tone in the article about Giovanni can best be described as critical and analytical, highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of Giovanni's work. She presents a balanced perspective, offering insights and observations with a discerning eye.
balanced force is when things are balanced.
not necessarily, all meals don't have to be balanced for the total diet to be balanced.
Because someone liberal wrote it. If you think it should be more balanced, you should edit it. That is what a wiki is for. :)
balanced
In the case of a star (that is not actually going nova or supernova) they are balanced.
A seesaw can be balanced with equal weight. I balanced on a ledge, so I wouldn't fall. The gymnast balanced on the beam, after a hand spring.
Article 3, Section 49a(b) "Except in the case of emergency . . . and with a 4/5ths vote of the total membership of each House, no appropriation in excess of the cash and anticipated revenue of the funds from which such appropriation is to be made shall be or is valid."
If the net force is zero, then the forces are balanced. If the net force is not zero, then the forces are not balanced. You can have a balanced pair of forces, but not a pair of balanced forces.
IF A and B are balanced set then A+B is balanced also.