To stand in opposition; to exhibit difference, unlikeness, or opposition of qualities., To set in opposition, or over against, in order to show the differences between, or the comparative excellences and defects of; to compare by difference or contrariety of qualities; as, to contrast the present with the past., To give greater effect to, as to a figure or other object, by putting it in some relation of opposition to another figure or object., The act of contrasting, or the state of being contrasted; comparison by contrariety of qualities., Opposition or dissimilitude of things or qualities; unlikeness, esp. as shown by juxtaposition or comparison., The opposition of varied forms, colors, etc., which by such juxtaposition more vividly express each other's peculiarities.
Describes the difference between two or more story or entities..
Follow the central idea in the story
false
indirect characterization
When a writer expects the reader to fill in the gaps, he or she is expecting the reader to compress.
The writer wants to write from the perspective of one character. -apex
The writer should be careful not to enter too many characters' heads or the reader may become confused.
characterization
characterization
by telling the reader what the character is like
false
The writer can use first person point of view of the character (I, me, mine, etc), or follow the character in third person point of view through the entire story (he, she). It makes the reader familiar with the character; while changing point of views or scenes all the time diversifies the reader's attention rapidly.
Direct characterization refers to when the author explicitly states traits or qualities about a character, providing direct information to the reader. This can involve descriptions of the character's appearance, personality, behavior, or background.
indirect characterization
By using the character's actions, interactions, and words to learn more about him or her
If a writer leaves out necessary information in the exposition, it can lead to confusion for the reader and make it difficult to follow the story. This could result in gaps in understanding character motivations, plot developments, or the setting of the story. It is important to provide enough context in the exposition to set up the rest of the narrative effectively.
The writer can omit certain details if they have a strong understanding of the subject, allowing the reader to fill in the gaps with their own imagination. This can create a more engaging and immersive reading experience by encouraging active participation from the reader. By writing authentically, the writer can establish trust with the reader and evoke a sense of realism in the narrative.
When a writer expects a reader to fill in the gaps, he or she is expecting the reader to compress.
The reader and writer work together through the act of communication. The writer creates a message or text, and the reader interprets it based on their own experiences, knowledge, and perspective. It is a dynamic interaction where the writer's intent is conveyed through the text and the reader's understanding is influenced by their own context.