Core clock is the actual speed at which the graphics processor on a video card on a computer operates. The core clock speed is measured in megahertz.
A core is a computer processor.
All computer functions except the real time clock are only active when the computer is on.
Intel Core i3 mobile processor as of 2010, but anytime before that, expect an Intel.
What is called the Binary number system. on and off is a binary state.
Well, on an average, it costs seven hundred dollars at least to build a gaming computer. There are many factors to be held account to when creating a gaming computer. Some of the best gaming computers available for children and adults would be computers manufactured by HP.
A very good question but no one knows or cares computers do operate for many years but newer software will not run on it A word was 8 bit now it is 64bits and expanding if we kept the same clock speed we just multiply the speed of computing tremendously. RAMS and integration of these chips made the complexity of programming ever expanding.
Kernal
A computers clock is a real clock
in computers speed refers to the number of instructions acomputer can execute at every clock pulse
The latest and best processor for computers would be one of Intel's i7 processors, dependent on clock speeds the amount of core the price will vary, but for an i7 3370k the price is about £223 or $340
Clock.
obviously about 100 MHz, since the core speed is calculated by multiplying the system clock speed and the given multiplier.
Xeon is for servers with server-motherboards Quad core is for desktop computers
Systems clock
Yes
Yes, it's.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example: Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock): (Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded) Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4; Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8; Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker: Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4 Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8 In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock. Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.