The most gaping advantage can be very easilly explained through example:
Single core processors have a single thread, and can process a single set of instructions per clock cycle. This looks like this (Saying this processor can process 2 instructions a clock):
(Note this is in an optimal setting where data is perfectly threaded)
Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2;
Clock 2: Instruction 3; Instruction 4;
Clock 3: Instruction 5; Instruction 6;
Clock 4: Instruction 7; Instruction 8;
Dual-Core processing would do this same instruction set much quicker:
Clock 1: Instruction 1; Instruction 2; Instruction 3; Instruction 4
Clock 2: Instruction 5; Instruction 6; Instruction 7; Instruction 8
In a perfectly threaded application, two equivilent-performance cores on a dual core processor would power through the work twice as quickly as a single-core model. A quad-core with these specs would do the entire instruction set in a single clock.
Even if it isn't always a 2x increase, multiple-core procesors have a distinct advantage in a very large range of applications.
The Intel Atom is available in both single core and dual-core varieties.The following Atom processors are single-core processors:230D410N270N280N450N470Z500Z510Z515Z520Z530Z540Z550The following Atom processors are dual-core processors:330D510
Dual-core processors use two cores for processing,they are capable of running more intensive programs,same are the quad-core processors(They use 4 cores for processing).In short,"THE HIGHER THE NUMBER OF CORES,THE BETTER IS THE PROCESSOR"
All intel processors Pentium 4 and down were single-core, or "core solo" processors. They weren't called "Core Solo," but by what respective family they came from. Pentium I, II, III, and 4.
Computer processor cores come as single core (one processor), Dual core (two processors), Quad core (four processors) and Six Core. Although apple now offers a computer which can have 8 or 12 cores
Smart phones use single core and multi-core processors.
A quad core is one component (computer chip) consisting of multiple cores (computer processors). Processors were originally developed only using one core. If you wanted to do multiprocessing you needed to have two processors in your computer which meant having a special motherboard that could support multiple processors. The new processors (referred to as Multi-Core processors) are simply a single chip with two or more processors.
Yes & no. If they are both single-core (one processor) than yes, the 2.0GHz is clocked at a higher speed. But in the case of multi-core processors it varies...such as: A 3.0GHz single-core CPU is "equivalent" to at 1.5GHz dual-core (two processors) CPU. Or a 1.5GHz Quad-core (four processors) CPU is faster than a 1.5GHz dual-core CPU because it'd be 1.3GHz x 4 processors versus 1.5GHz x 2 processors.
Of course it will run. But it will not be making full utilization of the multi-core architecture. In that aspect, single-core processors with more processing power are sometimes better suited to run single threaded application than multi-core processors with less processing power.
Yes, a quad-core processor is generally faster than dual-core or single-core processors because it can handle more tasks simultaneously.
Hyper threading processors simulate a dual core processor with only a single core. Technically you are still running a single core processor, but multiple tasks can be run more efficiently..
yes
Applications which have been designed to take advantage of mult-core processors will run about twice as fast on a quad core processor as compared to a dual core processor.