No. Sloppy is an adjective. Sloppily would be the corresponding adverb.
"Tuesday night" is a two word adverb of time. For those who insist that a part of speech must be a single word, "night" is an adverb modifying "gathered" and "Tuesday" is an adverb modifying "night".
The preposition for "insist" is generally "on". For example, one might insist on a particular course of action or insist on having something done a certain way.
The past tense of "insist" is "insisted."
In general, adverbs don't have gender or number agreements with nouns. However, they need to agree in form with corresponding adjectives when they modify an adjective. For example, "El vestido es muy bonito" (The dress is very pretty), where "muy" is agreeing with the feminine form of "bonito."
Able is an adjective, the corresponding noun is ability and the corresponding adverb is ably.
No. Sloppy is an adjective. Sloppily would be the corresponding adverb.
No. Insisted is the past tense and past participle of the verb (to insist). One adverb form is the adverb insistently.
No. Clever is an adjective. The corresponding adverb is cleverly.
There is no adverb derived from type. Not every word has a corresponding noun verb adverb adjective etc
No, it is not. Richer is a comparative adjective (more rich). The corresponding adverb is more richly.
Problematic and problematical are the corresponding adjectives to the noun problem. The corresponding adverb is problematically.
'Priority' is a noun, and adverbs are made from adjectives. However, 'prior' is an adjective that does not have a corresponding adverb.
The word outdoors *is* an adverb (e.g. gasoline should be stored outdoors). The corresponding adjective is outdoor.
No, it is not an adverb. Poorer is the comparative form of the adjective "poor." The corresponding adverbs are "poorly" and "more poorly."
No, the suffix -able is a suffix.
Dejection is the corresponding noun to the adverb dejectedly.