They aren't, there are several crimes that can be at more than one person, gang rape for instance.
That the cause of crime is an individuals protesting against society. This removes blame of the crime from the individual.
Ex Post Facto
They are not only a hate crime orgination but a group who shows a lack of respect against individual freedoms and civil liberties!
There is no law which makes it a crime to write anything against the US Government. There are laws which make it a crime to direct threats against government officials. There are state laws which make it illegal to write false statements about an individual, but these are civil laws.
Robbery is a crime against "the state" and not a crime against an individual. Once the police have arrested and charged you only the prosecutor's office may reduce or 'bargain down' the charge. You might have your attorney engage in a plea bargain to see if the charges will be reduced if you plead guilty to a lesser offense (i.e.: plea bargain).
As the phrase implies, in order to be a 'Crime Against Person' there had to be an offense committed against a live human individual (e.g.: Assault - Robbery - Murder - Mayhem - etc) as opposed to a "Crime Against Property' (i.e.: an inanimate object)(e.g.: Burglary - Auto Theft - Destruction of Property - Trespass - etc).
It was never declared a crime to be a Christian. The only crime was to be an atheist, which was the accusation occasionally levied against Christians.
the robbery itself is a crime againcst a person. the property is what is or was taken during the crime of robberyADDITIONAL: Despite its common usage in everyday language - - legally the word "ROBBERY" applies ONLY to offenses committed against persons.Crimes committed against property are legally described as "LARCENY" and "BURGLARY."
In a criminal case, the prosecution is the state. The prosecution is the institution conducting the legal proceedings against an individual who has been charged with a crime.
The duration of Man Against Crime is 1800.0 seconds.
Yes, victimless crimes should be free from governmental interference. The answer flows naturally from the answer to the question: "What is the proper role of government?" In the United States, the original role of government was to protect the individual liberty and freedom of the individual. In a victimless crime, no individual is impeding the liberty and freedom of another individual. Thus, the government should have no liberty/freedom interest to protect and should be indifferent to the "crime." Unfortunately, the government has transformed into an opposite role--that of mandating that the individual behave in accordance with the way that government thinks the individual ought to behave. Therefore, enforcement of laws against victimless crimes is a rejection of individual liberty and freedom and an acceptance of fascism/totalitarianism. In a "victimless crime," the government believes the individual has violated the government's ideal behavior. Indeed, when the government punishes an individual for committing a victimless crime, the only true victim is the individual, who has been punished.
Because the state stands in for the individual citizen in cases of criminal acts. The theory is - a crime against one citizen of the state is a crime against ALL citizens of the state. The state legislature passes the laws and statutes, and thus, the state prosecutes.