pollution, flounder hide in the sediment and if the color of the sediment changes they can no longer hide from predators.
sweet fact about flounder btw... when they are born their eyes are on opposite sides of their head and as they goes from juvenile to adults one of the eyes migrates to the other side of its body so that the fish can lie flat in the sediment to hide and which eye moves depends on the species of flounder it is gotta love adaptations
Stuffed flounder would be fylld flundra in Swedish.
you would eat it
Halibut would win. It tastes better and it is a bigger fish.
mabye mabye not
A Flounder is a European marine flatfish. So you would eat that. Also it means to struggle, make mistakes or move with difficulty.
Flounder is not an herbivore. It would be considered a carnivore because it's diet consists of fish spawn, polychaetes, crustaceans, and small fish.
yes
Organisms change significantly, or evolve in biological terms, only when there is a need for significant change. An example would be a natural disaster occurring, causing the founder effect or vast changes in the environment. This change in the environment might force a species to evolve unable to survive; those who don't have the needed adaptation would die out, leaving the "survivors" to reproduce. If no drastic change that would cause a need for adaptation occurred through geological time that pertained to a certain species, then no drastic change in the species itself would occur.
waterAn Abiotic environment would be classified under anything that is pretty much "not living" for example rocks, sunlight, air, & rocks ect.water
Yes, the 2010 oil spill would be human environment interaction. Any time humans change the environment, such as mining, farming, and polluting.
Rather thinking fish, think movement. Floundering = Thrashing so I would think sit is similar to perch. So, perch is to flounder as is sit is to thrash.
No because in an exothermic change energy is released not taken in. Melting would be an example of exothermic change.