Abuse.
If it's torture waiting for the answer then yes. If not, then check out amnesty.org To an extent, it's a matter of definition, but, alas, yes, torture is still widely used.
The torture game 1, 2 and 3 are good for pointless torture. The Torture Chamber (Any edition) requires you to earn more pain points to unlock other torture techniques.
any other religion than WHAT? I think most 'Christian' religions adhere to this belief, if you definition of "a torture stake" could be a cross.
Sometimes called moral relativism, the moral squint is our ability to look upon a wrong and imagine (or pretend) that we see right. For example, torture is wrong - we all agree. We're the good guys, after all, and good guys don't do that. Torture is what the bad guys do. And yet... in the name of anti-terrorism, we routinely torture people who have not been accused, much less convicted of any crime. Such people are innocent by definition, under American law. To argue that using "enhanced interrogative techniques" on them is not actually torture, or maybe it is but it is justified because it might save American lives, requires a moral squint, if not total blindness.
Torture = Tormentum (noun) Torture = Torquere (verb, 'to torture')
the action or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or to force them to do or say something, or for the pleasure of the person inflicting the pain.
No they are horrible they torture their animals and don't give them the care that they need
Physical torture was illegal in England. However their definition of torture was rather loose. Suspects could be forced to stay awake for as many as 5 days. They were forced to run around the room until they collapsed from exhaustion. The swimming test was not torture, it tested if they were a witch or not and was NOT designed to make them confess.
that is an evil
torture
"Good Samaritanism" or "volunteerism" fit the definition.
Perhaps "war zone" or "torture chamber" would be good antonyms for a sanctuary.