0
i think its another word for a solarplexus targeting punch
What else can I help you with?
When was Auricularia auricula-judae created?
Auricularia auricula-judae was created in 1789.
What type of fruiting body is the aricularia aricula judae?
Fruiting Bodies
What has the author Adamus Jessien written?
Adamus Jessien has written: 'De [andentia] epistolae Judae commentatio critica' -- subject- s -: Accessible book
Does jew's ears reproduce by spores?
Yes, Jew's ear fungus (Auricularia auricula-judae) reproduces by producing spores. These spores are released into the environment and can germinate under suitable conditions to form new fungal growth.
What is minnesotas state fungus?
The state fungus of Minnesota is Auricularia auricula-judae, also known as wood ear, jelly ear, or black fungus. It was designated as the state fungus in 1984 due to its economic importance in timber production.
Where was Goliath killed?
Goliath, known also as Goliath of Gath, is a figure in the Hebrew Bible, described as a giant Philistine warrior, he is famous for his combat with the young David, the future king of Israel. Gath was one of the mayor cities of the Philistines.
What 3 land areas make up Palestine?
The three major divisions of the British Mandate of Palestine are (in order order of size): Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. The three major divisions of the territory claimed by the Palestinian Authority are (in order of size): Samaria, Judea, and Gaza.
Difference between ear fungus and wood fungus mushroom?
Ear fungus (Auricularia auricula-judae) is a jelly-like fungus that grows on rotting wood and is commonly used in Asian cuisine. Wood fungus mushrooms (such as Shiitake or Oyster mushrooms) grow on dead or decaying wood, have a firmer texture than ear fungus, and are used in various culinary dishes worldwide for their unique flavors.
Where did the religion Christianity orginate?
Christianity is based on the life and teachings of Jesus as portrayed by the four aspostles in the gospes of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John and all took place in and around Judae in the first century AD. However, Christianity didn't really become a major religion until it was adapted by Paul of Taursus who was the first person to really spread the gospels around the middle east. The history of the church since that point is contentious and involved, with numerous ecunimical councils formally codifying the teachings into the rituals and dogma practiced to this day.
Where did jesus christ die cross or torture stake?
Jesus was put to death on the cross.There are some groups who believe that Jesus was executed on a stake. However, there is compelling evidence from the early church, historical, archaeological, and scriptural that all confirm Our Lord's execution on a Cross, whereas there is little, if any, real and reliable evidence from any historical or archaeological - or scriptural - source that even remotely suggests his execution on a 'stake'.The evidence includes:1. The symbolism of the Cross in the early Church.The cross symbol was already associated with Christians in the second century, as is indicated in the (anti-Christian, so not biased towards Christianity by any means!) arguments cited in the Octavius of Minucius Felix, chapters IX and XXIX, written at the end of that century or, possibly the very beginning of the next. Minucius Felix speaks of the cross of Jesus in its familiar form, likening it to objects with a crossbeam or to a man with arms outstretched in prayer. Also, Clement of Alexandria, who died between 211 and 216, frequently used the phrase τὸ κυριακὸν σημεῖον (the Lord's sign) to mean the cross. In his writings he describes the Cross as a symbol of the Christian - a Cross that was made by a vertical line crossed by a horizontal one. His contemporary, the great theologian Tertullian called the body of Christian believers as crucis religiosi, i.e. "devotees of the Cross". In his book De Corona, Chapter 3, written in 204, Tertullian tells how it was already a tradition for Christians to trace repeatedly on their foreheads the sign of the cross as a mark of their devotion to Christ. Another early Church father, who lived from 130-202, the great Irenaeus, wrote Adversus Haereses where in section II, xxiv, 4 said these words: ."The very form of the cross, too, has five extremities, two in length, two in breadth, and one in the middle, on which the person rests who is fixed by the nails". Irenaeus was a pupil of Polycarp, who was, in turn, a pupil of St John the Apostle, the only disciple cited in scripture that was actually present at the crucifixion. Hence, Irenaeus would hardly have made an error in the cross shape and therefore, the cross , as described by him, must be given serious thought.2. Historical and archaeological evidence of the Roman Empire. The term 'crucifixion' comes from the Latin crucifixio ("fixed to a cross", from the prefix cruci-, "cross", + verb ficere, "fix or do") and not 'fixed to a stake'. Very occasionally, the gibbet was only one vertical stake, called in Latin crux simplex or palus, or in Greek μόνος σταυρός (monos stauros, i.e. isolated stake). This was the simplest available construction for torturing and killing the criminals. More often, however, there was a cross-piece attached either at the top to give the shape of a T (crux commissa) or just below the top, as in the form most familiar in Christian symbolism (crux immissa).Other forms were in the shape of the letters X and Y. Shapes of cross tended to be local, so that, say a stake would be favoured in one part of the Empire, whilst a cross would be used in another.The earliest writings that speak specifically of the shape of the cross on which Jesus died describe it as shaped like the letter T (the Greek letter tau), or, morfe likely, composed of an upright and a transverse beam, together with a small ledge in the upright.The apochryphal Epistle of Barnabas, Chapter 9 mentions this, and, although not a canonical gospel, still undoubtedly belongs to the end of the first or beginning of the second century and contains a great deal of contemporary information that has to be taken seriously.Archaeologically, the Cross, as well as the fish, the star, the Chi-Rho sign, the anchor and the plough, are to be found on second century ossuaries of the Judaeo-Christian community in Judae which put any doubt as to the nature of the Cross shape beyond all reasonable doubt. Michael Green, an expert on the early church, confirms this in "Evangelism in the Early Church" pp. 214-215. In June of 1968, some 1st century tombs were accidentally unearthed by bulldozers working north of Jerusalem. Archaeologist, Vasilius Tzaferis excavated the tombs and unearthed the skeletal remains of a young man who had been crucified. Mr Tzaferis, who is not a Christian, wrote an article on his findings in the Biblical Archaeological Review. The crucified man was crucified on a cross-shaped cross, suggesting that that was the preferred local method for crucifixion in those parts - ie Jerusalem. Also, in local contemporary graffiti, there is an anti-Christian picture that shows a Christian believer worshipping an ass-headed god on a cross. The figure of Christ is crucified with his arms outstretched - graffiti drawn by a contemporary figure. Finally, within the catacombs in Rome, the Cross symbol is seen frequently as a symbol for Christianity, many of which date from the earliest Christian church there. I saw these symbols scratched onto walls, on tombs and even a stone altar myself whilst on a visit there a few years ago. All of the Cross symbols were of the standard Christian Cross as an upright and cross beam. Nowhere was there any hint of a 'stake' being used symbolically for an event which, along with the resurrection and ascension, was the pivotal belief of the early Church and the one to which Paul referred time and time again.3. The evidence in scripture. In their representations of Christ on what they call a torture stake, the Watchtower society of Jehovah's Witnesses always show 'one nail' through both of Christ's hands. However, in contrast to this, the Bible clearly states that Christ's crucifixion bore the marks of two nails in his hands and not one. This is seen in John 20:25 which records Thomas as saying: "...Unless I see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe." Note that the plurality of the nails refers to the hands only and not the hands and feet. This is evident both in the English account and the original Greek. In addition to this text, further biblical evidence that Christ was crucified on a cross, rather than a torture stake, can be gleaned from Matthew 27:37, which describes the charge placed "above" Christ's "head": "This is Jesus The King of the Jews". Again, the Greek is specific - the charge was placed above Christ's head. If Christ had been crucified on a torture stake, the charge would have been unreadable, as His hands would have obstructed the words. If it was placed higher up the pole, it may have been more appropriate for Matthew, normally a stickler for detail, to have written that the charge was placed above His hands. However, the traditional historic view of Christ being crucified on a cross, would both make the charge easier for all to have seen, and, as the text says, been placed above His head. In addition to this, all four gospels record Jesus carrying his Cross. In, e.g. John 19:17, the word used admittedly is stauros "και βασταζων εαυτω τον σταυρονεξηλθεν εις τον λεγομενον κρανιου τοπον ο λεγεται εβραιστι γολγοθα" But this does not mean that the word 'stauros means a stake in this context or else it would be described as 'monos stauros' instead. Certainly the earliest original Greek-to-Latin Bible translators knew the Cross as just that - so that the word 'Crucis' was used rather than anything else. The reasons for the misconception about the word stauros are too many and complex to go into, but there is an excellent inbiassed article that examines the original Greek etymology of the word and the Jehovah's Witness claims. The address is http://www.freeminds.org/doctrine/jesus/the-facts-on-crucifixion-stauros-and-the-torture-stake.html. Finally, Paul, in many of his letters, refers to Jesus being crucified on a Cross (stauros) and never, ever a stake (monos stauros).Answer:There are many Christian faiths that believe it was a cross. And they have tons of citations to back that up, citations that primarily are convincing to themselves. There are some Christian faiths that believe it was a stake. And they have tons of citations to back that up, citations that primarily are convincing to themselves.Secularly speaking, the Romans were not such slaves to detail as to do things exactly the same every time. There were executions by what would look to us like a cross. Others were executed by two beams that were in a capitol "T" shape. And some were executed on what could be called a stake.As the writers of the various gospels do not perfectly well agree on the last words of Jesus, it is doubtful that any agreement as to the exact shape of the wood he was executed on will be had.Nor, from a theological standpoint, should it matter. The theological point is in Jesus sacrificing himself for our sins, not the exact manner of his execution. One nail causing holes in both hands, two nails causing holes in both hands, or let it be three nails that all fell out and they tied him to a hook on a wall.The point is, believing in his divinity or not, it is the story of a man who did no wrong, and died trying to assist others. For those who follow this "Prince of Peace" to have hot debates over his execution is unseemly.AnswerJesus was nailed to a cross. The notion of Jesus being nailed to a stake frequently comes from the New World Translation.The NWT is commonly recognized among both Catholic and Reformed exegetes as having highly controversial translations of passages due to religious bias. This translation is read primarily among Jehovah's witnesses, and their Watchtower magazines frequently illustrate Christ nailed to the stipes, or vertical beam with a singular nail through both hands.However, the idea of a single vertical stake with a singular nail through both hands is exceedingly difficult to reconcile with the gospel of John:But Thomas, one of the twelve, who was called The Twin, was not with them when Jesus came. Consequently the other disciples would say to him: "We have seen the Lord!" But he said to them: "Unless I see in his hands (plural) the print of the nails (plural) and stick my finger into the print of the nails (plural) and stick my hand into his side, I will certainly not believe." (John 20:24-25 NWT)Here, even the New World Translation has a pluraluse of nails corresponding to Jesus' hands, of which St. Thomas wanted both visual and tactile confirmation, and which corresponds to the ancient Roman tradition of having the condemned carry a patibulum, or crossbeam.
