answersLogoWhite

0

A logical interpretation based on observation is a conclusion drawn from facts or evidence that aligns with reasoning and common sense. It relies on the information gathered through observation to draw a valid and sound conclusion that is supported by a logical process of thinking.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the difference between an inference and an observation?

Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.


What is the difference between an inference an observation?

Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.


What is a logical conclusion based on observation called?

An inference is a conclusion based on logical reasoning.


What an interpretation based on observation and prior knowledge?

Hypothesis


What interpretation based on observation and prior knowledge?

Hypothesis


What is the difference between observation and interpretation?

Observation is the act of noting or perceiving something using the senses, while interpretation involves assigning meaning or significance to those observations based on one's understanding, beliefs, or context. Observation is objective and based on direct sensory input, while interpretation can be subjective and influenced by personal biases or experiences.


What should all inferences be based on?

Inferences should be based on objective observation and logical reasoning.


What is A logical interpretation based on what scientists already know is?

Hypothesis.An inference.Hypothesis


What is a word for an interpretation of an observation?

Inference is a word for an interpretation of an observation


What is inference and observation?

Observation is stating a given fact that has nothing to do with your opinion. In contrast to that an inference is when you make an assumptions based on your INTERPRETATION of a fact.


Can science agree with religion?

Yes. Religion is a faith based interpretation and Science is an observation based interpretation of that which is. They are both interpretations of that which is. Where they diverge is when faith and observation do not agree. In this case, either the faith needs to be refined or the observation needs to be refined or, as is often the case, both need to be refined, because they are still interpretations of the same thing - that which is.


What is a logical interpretation of observations based on what scientists already know?

Hypothesis.An inference.Hypothesis