0
Yes. Religion is a faith based interpretation and Science is an observation based interpretation of that which is. They are both interpretations of that which is.
Where they diverge is when faith and observation do not agree. In this case, either the faith needs to be refined or the observation needs to be refined or, as is often the case, both need to be refined, because they are still interpretations of the same thing - that which is.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What two points do science and religion agree on in relation to creation?
That it, and we, exist.
Does both science and religion agree Adam and Eve were tempted by the serpent?
No, just religion. Snakes can't talk. But maybe it has a metaphorical meaning.
Is religion more powerful science?
Religion is not a science.
Must the facts about science agree with the Bible?
There is no real requirement for science to agree with the words of the Bible, or even for the Bible to literally agree with modern science. Stephen Jay Gould explained this when he said that the domain or magisterium for science is the empirical realm - what the universe is made from and why it works the way it does. The magisterium of religion includes the ultimate meaning and moral values. These magisteria are nonoverlapping - science does not comment on the ultimate meaning of life, while religion should not comment on the natural world.At times the Bible does disagree with the facts of science, which makes Stephen Jay Goud's recommendation more significant for Christians. For more information on this, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/when-science-challenges-the-bible
How are science and religion related?
Science and religion both seek to explain the world around us, but they operate in different ways. Science uses evidence and experimentation to understand the natural world, while religion often involves faith and belief in the supernatural. Some people find that science and religion can complement each other, while others see them as fundamentally incompatible. Ultimately, how they are related depends on individual perspectives and interpretations.
What has the author R C Wallace written?
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science
Did Nazis agree with religion?
no
Are religion and science mutually exclusive?
No. Religion is a faith based interpretation of that which is. Science is an observation based interpretation of that which is. They are both interpretations of that which is. Where they diverge is when faith and observation do not agree. In this case, either the faith needs to be refined or the observation needs to be refined or, as is often the case, both need to be refined, because they are still interpretations of the same thing - that which is.
Who said 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
; The quote is Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. : Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941More quotes of Albert Einstein; see link "Quotes Albert Einstein" on left.
Is religion an art or science?
It is an art as it can not be a science.
How were science and religion linked in ancient times?
God created the world including science, hence science and religion are interconnected.
Did you agree that science has limitation?
yez
