Namespaces are the way to organize .NET Framework Class Library into a logical grouping according to their functionality, usability as well as category they should belong to, or we can say Namespaces are logical grouping of types for the purpose of identification.
Java is not better than VBNet, nor is VBNet better than Java. Eachone has its advantages and disadvantaged over the other one.
They are(simply put) the things that you import.... EXAMPLE: VB Import (namespace) C# Using (namespace)
It is just a different coding language, but C is more for business that VBNET
x
An instance in VBNet is the same as an instance in any other language; it is the realisation of a type. In object-oriented languages, like VBNet, we say that an object is an instance of a class, where the class defines the object's type.
An instance in VBNet is the same as an instance in any other language; it is the realisation of a type. In object-oriented languages, like VBNet, we say that an object is an instance of a class, where the class defines the object's type.
Here's one: there's no namespace in C
no
Alan Cooper
profile namespace
Of course! All namespaces are nested by default since all namespaces exist in the global namespace. A class is also a namespace; therefore classes can also be nested.
A public function is scoped to the class in which it is declared. If declared non-static, then it must be invoked against an instance of the class but if declared static then namespace resolution is required to access the function. A non-member function is not scoped to any class but may be scoped to a namespace. If no namespace is specified, then it is scoped to the (unnamed) global namespace. If scoped to any other namespace then namespace resolution is required to access the function.