A friend had his Civil Rights restored after a felony conviction. Months later, one of the parties filed a Motion to Release Civil Rights. The record is sealed, and we're unable to see the motion or which party had filed it. The defense attorney is deceased, so info is unavailable. What is said motion? I understand the situation, but don't understand the desire for the information. A petition to restore 'rights' to a convicted felon is never a slam-dunk anyway. They do not have a 'right' to have their rights restored. It is totally up to the decision of the reviewing judge as to whether it will be granted or not. If the individual has had his rights restored - and has the court paperwork to prove it - and has never been notified that it has been rescinded - - except for curiosity's sake what difference does it make WHO may have objected, or WHY? Quite frankly, it's the very nature of this request that causes the court to seal these records in the first place. He's had his rights restored, my advice would be, let sleeping dogs lie.
In the Life - 1992 Civil Rites and Civil Rights was released on: USA: October 2008
African Americans in Connecticut From Civil War to Civil Rights - 2001 TV was released on: USA: 2001
Assaulted Civil Rights Under Fire - 2013 was released on: USA: 20 June 2013 (limited)
Cronkite Remembers - 1997 Vietnam and Civil Rights 1-5 was released on: USA: 1997
Hyde Park A Civil Rights Test Case - 2011 was released on: USA: 15 September 2011
Rogues in Robes - 2012 Civil Rights 3-65 was released on: USA: 21 October 2013
A History of Black Achievement in America - 2005 Civil Rights was released on: USA: 18 October 2005
James Free has written: 'James Free papers' -- subject(s): Motion pictures, Civil rights movements, Cold War, American newspapers, Civil rights, Journalism, Birmingham news, African Americans
There were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Act of 1968, but I don't think there was a Civil Rights Act of 1969.
No one has ended civil rights.
Civil rights
The Man's Civil rights were ignored.