0
A peer conference is a attendee-driven conference for up to 100 participants, usually lasting between 1 1/2 - 4 days.
An initial roundtable uncovers attendee interests, experience and expertise. Peer session sign-up is then used to determine the conference program which consists of small peer sessions that reflect the topics about which participants actually want to learn and share. At the end of the conference, two closing sessions, a personal introspective and a group spective give attendees an opportunity to reflect both personally and as a group on what has been learned and to discuss future group action and activities.
Peer conferences are growing in popularity because they adjust to the needs of the attendees, rather than relying on a pre-determined program drawn up in advance, and because they support opportunities for attendees to find out about each other and make useful and meaningful connections.
Peer conferences were first devised by Adrian Segar in 1992, and are described at www.segar.com and in the book "Conferences That Work: Creating Events That People Love" to be published in October 2009 (see www.conferencesthatwork.com.)
What else can I help you with?
Where can one host a phone conference?
A phone conference can be hosted wherever you have a phone. You can also use peer to peer software such as Skype to have a phone conference with multiple people.
What does the Conference Board do?
The Conference Board connects nearly 2000 businesses together via a network of peer to peer forums and conference calls to discuss business strategy marketing and advertising as well as public relations.
Are conference proceedings peer reviewed before publication?
Yes, conference proceedings are typically peer reviewed before publication to ensure the quality and validity of the research presented.
Are conference papers peer reviewed before being accepted for presentation?
Yes, conference papers are typically peer reviewed before being accepted for presentation. This means that experts in the field evaluate the quality and validity of the research before it is accepted for presentation at the conference.
What are the benefits of presenting research at a peer-reviewed conference?
Presenting research at a peer-reviewed conference provides credibility to your work, allows for feedback from experts in the field, and can lead to networking opportunities and collaborations with other researchers.
What are the key benefits of participating in a peer review conference?
Participating in a peer review conference allows for receiving constructive feedback, gaining new perspectives, improving research quality, and building a network of colleagues for future collaborations.
What is the difference between reviewing a scientific paper in a conference and submitting a paper during the peer review process?
Reviewing a scientific paper in a conference typically involves providing feedback before the paper presentation, focusing on its quality and relevance to the conference theme. Submitting a paper during the peer review process involves sending it to a scientific journal, where it undergoes rigorous evaluation by experts in the field for quality, originality, and validity before publication.
What are the benefits of presenting your research at a peer-reviewed conference?
Presenting your research at a peer-reviewed conference can provide several benefits. It allows you to receive feedback and validation from experts in your field, which can help improve the quality of your work. It also provides an opportunity to network with other researchers, potentially leading to collaborations or future opportunities. Additionally, presenting at a conference can enhance your credibility and visibility within the academic community.
What service does the company Ventrillo provide?
the service the company Ventrillo provides is a peer to peer voice chat conference using microphones, headset, or computers. Ventrillo maintains constant communication during work.
What is the process for submitting a conference article for review and publication?
The process for submitting a conference article for review and publication typically involves preparing your research paper according to the conference guidelines, submitting it through the conference's online submission system, undergoing a peer review process by experts in the field, revising the paper based on feedback, and finally, if accepted, presenting your work at the conference and having it published in the conference proceedings.
What are the key considerations when evaluating the quality and credibility of peer review reports in academic research?
When evaluating peer review reports in academic research, consider the expertise of the reviewers, the thoroughness of their feedback, the objectivity of their assessments, and the reputation of the journal or conference where the review was conducted.
What are the key differences between a journal paper and a conference paper?
The key differences between a journal paper and a conference paper are the publication venue and the review process. Journal papers are typically published in academic journals and undergo a rigorous peer-review process for quality and validity. Conference papers are presented at academic conferences and may have a less stringent review process, focusing more on relevance to the conference theme.
