Either an accessory before or after the fact.
It depends on whether they think the person is part of the crime as well. If they do, then the person is called an accomplice... someone who helped the suspect commit the crime. If not, then the person is just an associate... someone who knows the suspect and might be able to identify where he or she is.
"Crime" can function as both a noun and a verb. As a noun, it refers to illegal activities or offenses. As a verb, it means to commit a crime.
The Probable Clause is a part of the 4th Amendment, and it says that the government cannot search a prson, or ask for a search warrant without probable suspition
Principal offender - The person having the most active role, usually the person who commits the actus reas. Counselor - One who advises the principal offender on how to commit the crime. Procurer - A person who solicits the aid of others in taking part in a crime. Conspirator - someone who conspire with others to effect some unlawful purpose. The actus reas is the agreement, not the carrying out of the offense. Abettor - A person who is present, assisting or encouraging the principal offender at the time of the commission of the crime. Accessory- A person who aids and helps after the fact.
If you commit a crime, then you're breaking the law. If you call breaking the law a crime, then yes, you're committing a crime by committing a crime.Added; A criminal act is composed of two conscious acts: The Mens Reus (the criminal intent) and the Actus Reus (the criminal act). By committing the act you are completing the 2nd part of the offense necessary to convict you - therefore YES, you are engaged in committing a crime.But it's still a paradox. If you commit a crime by committing a crime, then wouldn't you be committing a crime for the committed crime for committing a crime> It goes on forever, but then final answer is YES.
I believe you are referring to an accessory, but in fact accessories are committing a crime and will be punished for doing so.
Not necessarily DNA match could mean the person was there before but it does not necessarily mean they were part of the crime
This is an opionion question and is not allowed on WikiAnswers, but I will answer it in my opinion. A gang is a formed group. Forming a group is an organized act. Also any crime which is done in concert (that is, with the assistance of another or more persons) is also an organized crime. So if you commit a crime on behalf of a gang, it is an organized crime.
So-called "organized crime" - like crime itself, can probaly never be eradicated - only controlled. Crime is inherent part of the "human condition."
Congress is the committee that educates and trains a person. This is part of organized retail crime.
Double Jeapordy
The person would be tried and punished where they committed the crime. It is part of our justice system to be tried by a jury of our peers, and our peers live in our own neighborhood. So if the person is caught elsewhere, he is returned to the jurisdiction where he committed the crime to be tried. This is why the process of extradition is in place.