The Silmarillion, most of the History of Middle Earth and The Children of Húrin fall before The Hobbit in the timeline of Middle Earth.
No, there is not a 4th lord of the rings movie because there were only three books. "The Fellowship of the ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King." If you want to count "The Hobbit" or "There and Back Again" it wouldn't be a lord of the rings movie because it basically tells of how the ring was found and the adventure of Bilbo Baggins and the Dwarves. In that book they didn't know that Bilbo's ring was the One Ring, so it is not a part of "The Lord of the rings". It would be a separate movie, and not part of the series.
Yes and no, The Hobbit was written before The Lord of the Rings.When Tolkien's publishers asked for a sequel to The Hobbit he gave them The Lord of the Rings with much more detail than The Hobbit. Then to make the two stories agree he had to go back and edit parts of the original Hobbit.The Hobbit involves Gandalf the wizard along with Bilbo Baggins and how the ring came into his possession. So yes it is part of The Lord of the Rings universe and series but it's not technically one of the six Lord of the Rings books. Those books were published in three volumes, The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King.
The Lord of the Rings trilogy of films were filmed in New Zealand between 2001 and 2003 : The Lord of the Rings : The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) , The Lord of the Rings : The Two Towers (2002) and The Lord of the Rings : The Return of the King (2003) .
the lord of rings movie
The prequel to the adventures depicted in The Lord of the Rings movies, The Hobbit, is being worked on now.
"The Hobbit" is the prequel of the Lord of the Rings. It chronicles a small portion of the One Ring's history, with some other interesting aspects that tie into the longer book.
The Hobbit is considered the prequel and occurs about 60 years in time before the Lord of the Rings. It is about how the One Ring came back to knowledge in Middle-earth after being hidden for so many years.The Silmarillion contains portions of the events from the beginning of Middle-earth right up to the destruction of Beleriand and the destruction of Numenor. It is far more like a history book than a story.The Hobbit. It tells of the life and adventures of Bilbo Baggins, Frodo's uncle. A movie is being made called "The Hobbit" in 2012. Peter Jackson comes back to direct another masterpiece.This may be slightly pedantic, but just to be precise:Technically the book The Lord of the Rings doesn't have a prequel. A prequel is written after a publication in question but describes the events that happened before the events in said publication.The Hobbit (book) was written before The Lord of the Rings. The Lord of the Rings is the sequel to The Hobbit, but The Hobbit is not the prequel to The Lord of the Rings.However, the movie The Hobbit is the prequel to The Lord of the Rings movie.The Hobbit
While the Lord of the Rings trilogy is over, there will be a fourth movie coming out that is a prequel to the trilogy called "The Hobbit" It is based on the book of the same name, and is Bilbo's tale, including how he came to the ring
J.R.R. Tolkien was the one who originally created orcs, yes. Although they also appeared in some of his other Middle Earth-related books, mainly The Hobbit, which is the prequel to The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
The Silmarillion, most of the History of Middle Earth and The Children of Húrin fall before The Hobbit in the timeline of Middle Earth.
It is a prequel to the Lord of the Rings movies, explaining how Bilbo gained possession of the One Ring. The Hobbit movies also show other things from Tolkien's other works, such as Sauron's return.
That would be The Lord of the Rings. It continues the saga of the One Ring. There are a couple of 'prequel' books including the Silmarillion.
No, there is not a 4th lord of the rings movie because there were only three books. "The Fellowship of the ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King." If you want to count "The Hobbit" or "There and Back Again" it wouldn't be a lord of the rings movie because it basically tells of how the ring was found and the adventure of Bilbo Baggins and the Dwarves. In that book they didn't know that Bilbo's ring was the One Ring, so it is not a part of "The Lord of the rings". It would be a separate movie, and not part of the series.
The Hobbit is set about 60 years before most of the events in The Lord of the Rings.The Hobbit was published in 1937. The Lord of the Rings did not come out for over 20 years after that. It took Tolkien a long time to write the follow up.
The Lord of the Rings trilogy of films were filmed in New Zealand between 2001 and 2003 : The Lord of the Rings : The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) , The Lord of the Rings : The Two Towers (2002) and The Lord of the Rings : The Return of the King (2003) .
Yes and no, The Hobbit was written before The Lord of the Rings.When Tolkien's publishers asked for a sequel to The Hobbit he gave them The Lord of the Rings with much more detail than The Hobbit. Then to make the two stories agree he had to go back and edit parts of the original Hobbit.The Hobbit involves Gandalf the wizard along with Bilbo Baggins and how the ring came into his possession. So yes it is part of The Lord of the Rings universe and series but it's not technically one of the six Lord of the Rings books. Those books were published in three volumes, The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King.