Altruism^_^
Immanuel Kant believed that good will, or acting out of a sense of duty and moral obligation, is the highest moral principle. He argued that actions should be done for the sake of duty, rather than for personal gain or desire, in order to be truly moral.
The principle of fairness advocates for treating all individuals equally and justly based on their actions and circumstances. It seeks to ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed and is not discriminated against unfairly. The ideal of moral equity suggests that ethical decisions should be made with a sense of justice and impartiality, striving for balance and fairness in all moral considerations.
Moral absolutism views all actions as either moral or immoral.
The Principle of Double Effect (PDE) offers a clearer framework for evaluating ethical dilemmas where actions have both good and bad outcomes, emphasizing intention and the moral weight of each effect. It allows for morally permissible actions that may lead to unintended negative consequences, provided the action itself is good or neutral, the good effect is intended, and the bad effect is not disproportionate. In contrast, the Minus Malum principle tends to focus on minimizing harm without adequately considering the intentions behind actions or the moral legitimacy of the acts themselves. Thus, PDE provides a more nuanced approach to complex moral situations.
Kant's central ethical principle is the categorical imperative, which says that the only moral actions are those consistent with the moral standards that we would want everyone else to follow. For example, Kant argued that lying is always wrong
It is criminal law: society's response to actions that are criminal or negligent.
The "eye for an eye" principle in the Bible emphasizes the concept of proportionate justice, where the punishment should match the crime. It serves as a guideline for moral and ethical decision-making by promoting fairness and accountability in resolving conflicts and dispensing justice. This principle encourages individuals to consider the consequences of their actions and to seek restitution rather than seeking revenge.
Parents should pay great attention to the moral upbringing of their children.Teaching children to be moral will serve them well throughout their lives.
the answer is conduct
No, the foundational moral principle is typically broad and universal, guiding individuals on how they should conduct themselves in various situations.
The philosopher Immanuel Kant articulated the idea that if an action cannot be universally applied without contradiction, then it cannot be considered moral. This principle is part of his ethical framework known as the "Categorical Imperative," which emphasizes that moral actions should be based on maxims that can be consistently willed as universal laws. If an action fails this test of universality, it undermines its moral validity.
Kant argued that greed, or avarice, is morally wrong because it involves prioritizing self-interest over moral duties and treating others merely as means to achieve personal gain. He believed that moral actions should be guided by the principle of universalizability, meaning that one's actions should be based on principles that could be applied to everyone without contradiction.