0
grass we can always live without grass
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can plants live without humans and can humans live without plants?
yes. no.
Is soda a renewable resource?
soda, though it may not be considered a resource by some, is certainly renewable, the liquid is goes back in the environment and the sugars come from renewable plants. The CO2, is released into the environment. The can is not renewable, but it is recyclable
Is a habitat renewable?
Its not an energy or resource. it is a habitat of living things. the place where the living things live is called its habitat.
Why is soil considered a resource?
It is considered a resource because all of the biodiversity cannot live without it. plants need it to grow, veggie-eaters and humans need the veggies, meat-eaters need the veggie-eaters and so on.
Why is wildlife a natural resource?
Natural resources are the raw materials that are needed to live. They are raw materials for everything that is in the world today. Without natural resources, humans would not have a place to live, water to drink, or food.
What can humans live without?
# # #
Can humans live without heads?
Yes humans can live with out heads if they are an zombie.
Do you live in a renewable or non renewable world?
i think we live in a renewable n non renewable world.
Can humans live without honey?
Yes.
Can humans live without stem cells?
No.
Are fish renewable resource?
Fish are renewable, since they live on renewable foods and reproduce by natural means. Whether something is renewable or not depends on the difference between how fast it is removed and how fast it is replaced. Living things reproduce themselves, and some can do it faster than others. Flies and rabbits breed quickly, while oak trees and whales breed slowly. If you wanted to get rid of all the flies in the world, you'd have to work very fast to kill as many as you could as quickly as you could, because otherwise the remaining flies would soon repopulate the world and you'd have to start again. But if you wanted to get rid of all the oak trees, you wouldn't have to work nearly as fast. It takes a very long time for an acorn to grow into an adult tree, and provided you work faster than that, you can remove all oak trees faster than they can reproduce and replace themselves. So the question about fish is really a question about how fast the population can replace the fish that we remove from the sea. If we remove one or other species of fish faster than it can reproduce, it is not a renewable resource. If we remove them at a rate that the population can replace, it is a renewable resource. In other words, if we are careful, considerate and conservative, fish are a renewable resource. If we are greedy, and take them from the sea too quickly, then they are not renewable.
Can you live without the ocean?
No, humans cannot live without establishing a harmonious connection with the ecosystems in the oceans.
