The name in science is theory.
The first goal of each scientific discipline is to observe and describe natural phenomena in order to develop hypotheses that explain these observations. By conducting experiments and gathering data, scientists aim to test these hypotheses and refine our understanding of the natural world.
The proximate hypothesis refers to explanations that focus on the immediate, underlying mechanisms or causes of a phenomenon. In biological contexts, it often addresses how behaviors, traits, or processes occur based on genetic, physiological, and environmental factors. This contrasts with ultimate hypotheses, which seek to explain the evolutionary reasons behind a trait or behavior. Essentially, proximate hypotheses answer "how" something happens, while ultimate hypotheses address "why" it has evolved.
A procedure used to explain why or how something happens is often referred to as a scientific method. This method involves systematic observation, experimentation, and analysis to gather evidence and draw conclusions. By formulating hypotheses and testing them through controlled experiments, researchers can establish cause-and-effect relationships and enhance understanding of the phenomenon in question. Ultimately, this structured approach helps validate or refute theories based on empirical data.
a principle that tries to explain something that happens in nature
false
Scientific laws describe how natural phenomena behave consistently under certain conditions. They do not explain why things happen or the underlying mechanisms behind the observed behavior. Theories, on the other hand, provide explanations based on tested hypotheses and are used to understand the causes behind observed phenomena.
Creating a presentationProcess Analysis: Presents a chronological sequence of steps that explain how something is done, how something happens, or how readers can do something.
Scientists explain phenomena by using observations, experiments, and theories to make sense of the underlying principles that govern how things work. They rely on the scientific method to systematically test hypotheses and draw conclusions based on evidence. Through this process, scientists can develop models and theories to explain why things happen in the natural world.
No, scientific laws describe what happens under certain conditions, based on repeated observations and experiments. They do not explain why things happen, but provide a framework for understanding and predicting natural phenomena.
He proposed a theory that attempts to explain why and the fact of evolution works.It is, so far, the best and most accurate theory that adequately explains why evolution happens.
Willingness is when you are willing to do something no matter what happens. Acting wisely is when you make good decisions and you show that you are smart about doing something.
No, a scientific law does not attempt to explain an observed pattern in nature; rather, it describes a consistent and universal relationship that has been observed under specific conditions. Laws summarize the results of repeated experiments and observations, often expressed mathematically, while scientific theories provide explanations for why those patterns occur. In essence, laws tell us what happens, but theories explain how and why it happens.