it is the conclusion
Conclusion.
This is usually called a conclusion.
true
A summary of everything you learned while researching your project . It's not a summary of your experiment. It should discuss your topic.
Oswald Avery proved that DNA and not proteins were the source of genetic material.
The summary is what the result was. Why it mattered, and what it meant.
a conclusion
conclusion
it is the conclusion
Conclusion.
This is usually called a conclusion.
Oswald Avery tested molecules called DNA, RNA, and proteins in his experiment on the transforming principle in bacteria. He discovered that DNA was the molecule responsible for carrying genetic information and causing hereditary changes in bacteria.
The variable in Oswald Avery's experiment was the type of enzyme used to break down the polysaccharide capsule in the heat-killed S strain bacteria. By using different enzymes, Avery was able to determine which specific molecule was responsible for transforming the R strain bacteria into the pathogenic S strain.
You can find chapters and a summary of "Maximum Ride: The Angel Experiment" in the book itself, by James Patterson. You may also find summaries and chapter breakdowns online on websites such as SparkNotes or Goodreads.
The conclusion in an experiment is typically called the "results", "findings", or "summary". It summarizes the key outcomes and insights discovered during the experiment.
No, you need to do this. Go into your science book and read what it has on Pasteur. It is only a few paragraphs. Take the main idea of each and you have a summary of his experiment.