0
What else can I help you with?
What does written primary source mean?
A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.
What is a primary source for social studies 6th grade?
A primary source is a like something official, like as document, or an artifact.
How might the use of an artifact as a primary source compare with the use of a written primary source?
The use of an artifact as a primary source is different than the use of a written primary source because when you exacavate for an artifact, you may have to make guesses. However, with a written primary source, you don't need to guess as the writing inside will have the answers to your questions or guesses.
Is the hornbook a primary or a secondary source?
It depends on what you need it for :)
A source that is written or created by a person who experienced an event personally is called a?
Primary Source - Apex Learning
Something written or created by a person who witnessed a historical event?
i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source
Is the presidents inaugural address a primary source or secondary source?
It is a primary source because it came directly from him. An analysis of the speech written by a columnist would be a secondary source.
What is primary and secondary scources?
Primary Source: a firsthand account, also something written by someone who was there. Secondary source: a secondhand account also something written by someone who was not there.
What is difference between a description of the battle of bunker hill from a primary source and from a secondary source?
A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.
What is the difference between a description of the battle of bunker hill from a primary source and a secondary source?
A "primary source" is a description of the event written by the people who experienced it. A "secondary source" is a description written by people who read the books that the primary-source people wrote. So, a "primary source" for the Battle of Bunker Hill would be written by the soldiers who fought the battle or who observed it first-hand. Each person saw only a PART of the battle; the part he was involved in. Even for such a small battle as Bunker Hill, no one person saw it all; some things were happening on the other side of the hill. A "primary source" can also be written by asking questions of people who were there. The "Secondary sources" read the books that the eye-witness observers and participants wrote, sometimes decades later.
Would a story about Persian wars still be a primary source if it were written by a historian?
No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.
To be considered a primary source a source must be?
written or created by a person who experienced an event
