0
Sometimes, even when scientists try their hardest, they miss important things that should have or could have been controlled in their experiments. After all, anyone conducting research of any kind will have to start with a set of assumptions about the observations being studied. But it is not always clear that researchers in a given field are sharing the same set of initial assumptions. If scientists don't even make an effort to be clear and objective, and let biases affect their thinking, then conflicts and problems multiply. From a radical point of view, it is probably ok for scientists to be as completely biased as they want to be, provided that they are breathtakingly and completely honest in how they report the construction, controls, results and biases that went into the research. Being biased is absolutely NOT the same thing as being dishonest or deliberately mis-leading. Blatantly mis-reporting or mis-representing data and analysis is NEVER ok, although it does occur from time to time.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agothere is a reason the type of an experiment that you do could affect bias thats why you should read the instructions so read your paper and answer it your self ok thanks for searching me adios....................... BYE BYE
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThat is because they need the evidence to speak for itself. If there is any chance their own bias gets into the experiments, their experiments may be discredited. You don't want to spend lots of money on costly research, only for nobody to take your study seriously.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoYou always want to eliminate all biases in an experiment. Biases may create discrepancies in data, and you always want to be as accurate as possible.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoBy testing random samples
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do scientist remain objective during experiments?
Scientists go through quite a bit of trouble to try and make sure that their experiments remain completely objective and free from observer bias. They use the scientific method of research (forming conclusions based on the facts, not finding facts to support preconceived conclusions). In a lot of research they use single, and double blinds, which keeps both the experimenter and the participants of an experiment honest.
When scientists analyze the results of their experiments then they?
They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why should scientists do repeated trials with every experiment?
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that?
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that: 1. Others can try to reproduce the results. 2. Their work can be repeated. 3. Their experimental procedures can be reviewed.
How did alchemists similar to and different from modern scientists?
The alchemists were the first chemists. But in addition to mixing chemicals, they also believed that magic would help with their experiments and formulas. It didn't. But their experiments led to the development of the science of chemistry.
How do you use experimental variable in a sentence?
Scientists try to control for experimental bias.An experimental bias often goes unrecognized if the student does not carefully consider sources of potential biases.A desire for a specific outcome is an experimental bias.
How do scientist remain objective during experiments?
Scientists go through quite a bit of trouble to try and make sure that their experiments remain completely objective and free from observer bias. They use the scientific method of research (forming conclusions based on the facts, not finding facts to support preconceived conclusions). In a lot of research they use single, and double blinds, which keeps both the experimenter and the participants of an experiment honest.
When scientists analyze the results of their experiments then they?
They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.
What else do sciestist do other than organze the data?
Scientists also design and perform the experiments in which the data was collected. They also analyze the data and try to explain them.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why should scientists do repeated trials with every experiment?
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
When scientist analyze the result of their experiments they?
They see if the results are what they expected them to be. If they were not, they try again. If they did, they then ask other scientists if they also got the same results. They do this part by publishing the experiment and results in a scientific journal and as for comments.
What scientist do that is the basis for the investigation?
scientists run experiments. That is the basis of all a scientist does.
