An executive agreement is an agreement not requiring Senate approval and made directly between the president and the head of state of Another Country.
By law, the President is required to inform Congress within sixty days of making an Executive Agreement.
Yes - these are mostly the cabinet members. Senate approval of the appointments is required.
It's complicated. The simplest answer is to say that Congress could not "unapprove it".Under a typical treaty analysis, President Obama would be required by the US Constitution to get Senate ratification of the treaty with a two-thirds majority. However, Obama argued that the Iran Deal was an "executive agreement" and not a "treaty". As an executive agreement, the President is not required to seek Congressional approval, but he may grant Congress the right to vote up or down on the agreement. This up or down vote is a plain majority vote in the Congress, but can be vetoed by the President. This effectively makes the approval requirement for an "executive agreement" the almost-exact reverse of the approval requirement for a "treaty". Instead of two-thirds of the Senate being required to approve a "treaty", now, two-thirds of the Senate and two-thirds of the House of Representatives are required to override the Presidential veto preventing their disapproval of the "executive action" from coming to pass. Congress was not able to muster the two-thirds needed to oppose the Iran Nuclear Deal.Note that Obama is not the first or only President to use this legal finagling in order to avoid a direct Senate vote. "Executive Agreements" were first invented by Franklin D. Roosevelt and were used by all subsequent US Presidents.
Parents approval is required when girl wants to marry, and girl approval is also required when someone come ask her hand from her parents. However if she wants to marry someone but her parents didn't agree, then she and he can go to court and court will sign the marriage without parents approval because of their agreement.
If the President of the United States refuses to sign a bill into law, he vetos it and returns it to the Congress. The Congress can, by 2/3 vote of both the House of Representatives AND the Senate, override the President's veto, and the law goes into effect without the President's approval.
Only with the approval of child support enforcement or the courts.
Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required an absolute unanimous approval. In contrast, the Constitution only required a three quarters approval, thus allowing lenience in the approval of amendments.
While it is the case that all "treaties" require the ratification of the Senate, e.g. the two-thirds approval vote, this became incredibly difficult and cumbersome. As a result, President Franklin D. Roosevelt decided that he would term his international negotiations something other than treaties, like executive agreements. Because "executive agreements" are never mentioned in the US Constitution, there is no provision requiring any congressional approval. Note that from a functional and international law perspective there is absolutely no difference between a "treaty" and an "executive agreement".However, Congress retaliated in the 1960s, by passing a law requiring presidents to notify the legislative branch of all "executive actions" signed. Of course, this simply meant that Congress would be aware of the "executive agreement" and not in a position to oppose it. In some cases, the President will grant Congress the right to vote up or down on the "executive agreement" he reached during the notification process. This up or down vote is a plain majority vote in the Congress, but can be vetoed by the President. This effectively makes the approval requirement for an "executive agreement" the almost-exact reverse of the approval requirement for a "treaty". Instead of two-thirds of the Senate being required to approve a "treaty", now, two-thirds of the Senate and two-thirds of the House of Representatives are required to override the Presidential veto preventing their disapproval of the "executive action" from coming to pass.Almost every President since FDR has taken advantage of this incredibly useful tool and what Obama is doing on the Iran deal is no different.
If you are the father, and have signed an agreement to allow the adoption, than no. You have neither rights, nor responsibilities. But, court approval is required.
There is no AICTE approval is required for DEC approval courses . It is given by AICTE official in a reply to a RTI question . A.Ramasubramanaian.
Yes it is required to fill out a rental agreement form to rent a house. Without this agreement the landlord of the house will not let you rent the house unless you fill out the agreement.
Congress